2012
DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2012.3841
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity and Reliability of Hallux Valgus Angle Measured on Digital Photographs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
45
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
45
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Statistical power may be further improved by performing association analysis with ordinal51 52 or continuous53 measurement of HV. However, in the current study, not all of the participating studies had such measurements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statistical power may be further improved by performing association analysis with ordinal51 52 or continuous53 measurement of HV. However, in the current study, not all of the participating studies had such measurements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A significant limitation of both methods is that a precise measurement of the deviation in degrees compared to radiological measurements is not possible. Nix reported measurements of hallux valgus by using standardized digital photographs [17]. Compared to clinical scales a more incremental measurement of the deviation is possible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This tool might be considered as a non-invasive technique in order to measure the HV deformity degree using a standardized photograph set, divided into I degree (no HV), II degree (mild HV), III degree (moderate HV), and IV degree (severe HV). This scale showed an excellent inter-examiner repeatability (κ = 0.86) [29]. Also, excellent inter-examiner reliability and validity were shown for the HV angle between photographic measures and radiographs.…”
Section: Hv Deformity Degreesmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…A total sample of 100 subjects with different HV deformity degrees was recruited by a consecutive convenience sampling method in an outpatient clinic from March to November 2019 [4][5][6][7]. Inclusion criteria comprised subjects older than 18 years old, being healthy subjects for the control group classified as I degree-no HV presence (n = 25), as well as patients with HV deformity for cases groups, such as II degree-mild HV (n = 25), III degree-moderate HV (n = 25), and IV degree-severe HV (n = 25) [28,29].…”
Section: Samplementioning
confidence: 99%