2020
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17197161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity and Reliability of International Physical Activity Questionnaires for Adults across EU Countries: Systematic Review and Meta Analysis

Abstract: This review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020138845) critically evaluates test-retest reliability, concurrent validity and criterion validity of different physical activity (PA) levels of three most commonly used international PA questionnaires (PAQs) in official language versions of European Union (EU): International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ-SF), Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ), and European Health Interview Survey-Physical Activity Questionnaire (EHIS-PAQ). … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

11
119
1
6

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(137 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
(152 reference statements)
11
119
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the measurement tool IPAQ-SF, the recall bias seems to be rather low compared to other questionnaires with only 7 days ( Sember et al, 2020 ). However, the IPAQ-SF does not distinguish between different domains of physical activity (i.e., occupational, domestic, transportation, and leisure time), and these usually provide different effects on health.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Regarding the measurement tool IPAQ-SF, the recall bias seems to be rather low compared to other questionnaires with only 7 days ( Sember et al, 2020 ). However, the IPAQ-SF does not distinguish between different domains of physical activity (i.e., occupational, domestic, transportation, and leisure time), and these usually provide different effects on health.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The methodological quality of the included articles included was examined using the Quality Assessment of Physical Activity Questionnaire checklist [37], which was developed specifically for assessing methodological quality in systematic reviews of PA questionnaires. The risk of bias assessment of the final sample of 14 included articles was conducted, following the criteria previously set by Sneck [38] and Sember [23,39], following Cochrane's guidelines for Systematic Reviews and Interventions [40].…”
Section: Quality and Risk Of Bias Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study has limitations. Despite the findings that the dietary screeners, particularly the liking survey, explained success in weight loss, the results should be assessed with full measures of dietary intake [1], as well as physical activity [67]. In addition, the small sample size of only women reduces the generalizability of the findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%