2020
DOI: 10.1589/jpts.32.120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity and reliability of isometric knee extension muscle strength measurements using a belt-stabilized hand-held dynamometer: a comparison with the measurement using an isokinetic dynamometer in a sitting posture

Abstract: This study aimed to determine the validity and reliability of isometric knee extension muscle strength measurements using a belt-stabilized hand-held dynamometer compared to that using an isokinetic dynamometer with the participant in a sitting posture. [Participants and Methods] Forty-two university students participated. The isometric knee extension muscle strength was measured using a hand-held dynamometer and an isokinetic dynamometer. For both measurements, the participants were in the similar sitting pos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Knee flexors and extensors MIS was measured, for both lower limbs alternatively, using a belt-stabilized dynamometer (Sauter FK 1k, Sauter GmbH, Balingen, Germany) with subjects in a setting position and the knee placed at 90° flexion. Measurements using a belt-stabilized dynamometer have been shown to be valid and reliable in older subjects when compared to the standard method of isometric knee muscle strength assessments using isokinetic dynamometers [ 35 , 36 , 37 ]. MIS was specifically recorded in Newtons (N) and three repetitions were performed for each limb, first for knee extensors and then for knee flexors.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knee flexors and extensors MIS was measured, for both lower limbs alternatively, using a belt-stabilized dynamometer (Sauter FK 1k, Sauter GmbH, Balingen, Germany) with subjects in a setting position and the knee placed at 90° flexion. Measurements using a belt-stabilized dynamometer have been shown to be valid and reliable in older subjects when compared to the standard method of isometric knee muscle strength assessments using isokinetic dynamometers [ 35 , 36 , 37 ]. MIS was specifically recorded in Newtons (N) and three repetitions were performed for each limb, first for knee extensors and then for knee flexors.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the imaging findings, a multidisciplinary wound care team conference is held to evaluate the treatment strategy and degree of progression of the deformity. Physical function was determined by knee extension muscle strength [ 21 ], ROM in the ankle joint [ 22 ], presence or absence of plantar sensory disorder [ 23 ], and ambulation status were evaluated using the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) movement parameter ambulation score [ 24 ]. The measurement methods and definitions of the study items are shown in Table 1 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Claw toe [ 20 ] Defined as an extended MTPJ, flexed PIPJ, flexed DIPJ, and determined via clinical examination. Knee extension muscle strength [ 21 ] Maximum voluntary isometric knee extension muscle strength was measured using a hand-held dynamometer (μ-tasF-1, Anima, Tokyo, Japan). For knee extensor strength measurements, participants were asked to sit on a chair with the knee flexed at 90° and push at maximum strength against the dynamometer pad for 5 s. Isometric knee extensor strength was measured twice per side, and the highest value for the right and left legs was used to represent the knee extensor muscle strength.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the imaging ndings, a multidisciplinary wound care team conference is held to evaluate the treatment strategy and degree of progression of the deformity. Physical function was determined by knee extension muscle strength [21], ROM in the ankle joint [22], presence or absence of plantar sensory disorder 23 , and ambulation status were evaluated using the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) movement parameter ambulation score 24 . The measurement methods and de nitions of the study items are shown in Table 1.…”
Section: Data Collection and De Nitionmentioning
confidence: 99%