Validity and reliability of peak tibial accelerations as real-time measure of impact loading during over-ground rearfoot running at different speeds

Berghe, Pieter Van den; Six, Joren; Gerlo, Joeri; Leman, Marc; Clercq, Dirk De

doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.01.039

Cited by 57 publications

(75 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The accelerometer characteristics were as follows: mass: 20 milligrams, resolution: 70 mg, with digital output (SPI-compatible). The breakout board (dimensions: 21 × 13 mm) was fitted in a shrink socket [12]. The total mass was less than 3 grams, making it lighter than commercially available sensors in a plastic housing that have been used for the registration of tibial acceleration during running [2][3][4].…”

Section: Interventionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Post hoc inspection of the values of axial peak tibial acceleration revealed that the selected measurement range was more than enough for the goal of our study (Figure 4). The tibial skin was prestretched bilaterally at ~8 cm superior to each medial malleolus to minimize skin oscillation [9,12]. An illustration of such prestretch through the use of zinc oxide tape (Strappal, Smith and Nephew, UK) is shown in Figure 2.…”

Section: Interventionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Each accelerometer was placed on the tight skin of the prestretched area. The axial axis of an accelerometer was visually aligned with the longitudinal axis of each shin while the subject was standing [12,29]. The distal aspect of both lower legs was locally wrapped in a non-elastic adhesive bandage (Strappal) [12].…”

Section: Interventionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The axial axis of an accelerometer was visually aligned with the longitudinal axis of each shin while the subject was standing [12,29]. The distal aspect of both lower legs was locally wrapped in a non-elastic adhesive bandage (Strappal) [12]. The manner of attachment with visual alignment and taping of the sensor to the skin has been applied in research on tibial acceleration in running [9,12].…”

Section: Interventionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The change(s) and the variability in peak tibial acceleration inherent to this locomotor task have been neglected within a session [4][5][6]8]. A reason to neglect the time course of the axial peak tibial acceleration may + Sensors 2020, 20, x FOR PEER REVIEW 2 of 17 at a high sampling rate and to immediately detect the magnitude and the time of the peaks of the axial component [12]. Under supervised use, a reduction of almost 30% in axial peak tibial acceleration was found when comparing the end of a 20-minute biofeedback run with the nobiofeedback condition [5].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Change-Point Detection of Peak Tibial Acceleration in Overground Running Retraining

Berghe

Gosseries

Gerlo

et al. 2020

Sensors

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A method is presented for detecting changes in the axial peak tibial acceleration while adapting to self-discovered lower-impact running. Ten runners with high peak tibial acceleration were equipped with a wearable auditory biofeedback system. They ran on an athletic track without and with real-time auditory biofeedback at the instructed speed of 3.2 m·s −1 . Because inter-subject variation may underline the importance of individualized retraining, a change-point analysis was used for each subject. The tuned change-point application detected major and subtle changes in the time series. No changes were found in the no-biofeedback condition. In the biofeedback condition, a first change in the axial peak tibial acceleration occurred on average after 309 running gait cycles (3 40"). The major change was a mean reduction of 2.45 g which occurred after 699 running gait cycles (8 04") in this group. The time needed to achieve the major reduction varied considerably between subjects. Because of the individualized approach to gait retraining and its relatively quick response due to a strong sensorimotor coupling, we want to highlight the potential of a stand-alone biofeedback system that provides real-time, continuous, and auditory feedback in response to the axial peak tibial acceleration for lower-impact running.

show abstract

Section: Interventionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Interventionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Interventionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Interventionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Change-Point Detection of Peak Tibial Acceleration in Overground Running Retraining

Berghe

Gosseries

Gerlo

et al. 2020

Sensors

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Sex‐ and age‐related differences in kinetics and tibial accelerations during military‐relevant movement tasks in U.S. Army trainees

Johnson,

Sara,

Bradach

et al. 2024

European Journal of Sport Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Lower extremity injuries are prevalent in military trainees, especially in female and older trainees. Modifiable factors that lead to higher injury risk in these subgroups are not clear. The purpose of this study was to identify whether external loading variables during military‐relevant tasks differ by age and sex in U.S. Army trainees. Data was collected on 915 trainees in the first week of Basic Combat Training. Participants performed running and ruck marching (walking with 18.1 kg pack) on a treadmill, as well as double‐/single‐leg drop landings. Variables included: vertical force loading rates, vertical stiffness, first peak vertical forces, peak vertical and resultant tibial accelerations. Comparisons were made between sexes and age groups (young, ≤19 years; middle, 20–24 years; older, ≥25 years). Significant main effects of sex were found, with females showing higher vertical loading rates during ruck marching, and peak tibial accelerations during running and ruck marching (p ≤ 0.03). Males showed higher vertical stiffness during running and peak vertical tibial accelerations during drop landings (p < 0.01). A main effect of age was found for vertical loading rates during running (p = 0.03), however no significant pairwise differences were found between age groups. These findings suggest that higher external loading may contribute to higher overall injury rates in female trainees. Further, higher stiffness during running may contribute to specific injuries, such as Achilles Tendinopathy, that are more prevalent in males. The lack of differences between age groups suggests that other factors contribute more to higher injury rates in older trainees.

show abstract

A Primer on Wearable Technology for Injury Risk Management in Distance Running

Van den Berghe

2024

Individualizing Training Procedures With Wearable Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Validity and reliability of peak tibial accelerations as real-time measure of impact loading during over-ground rearfoot running at different speeds

Abstract: Short communication Validity and reliability of peak tibial accelerations as real-time measure of impact loading during over-ground rearfoot running at different speeds

Cited by 57 publications

References 25 publications

Change-Point Detection of Peak Tibial Acceleration in Overground Running Retraining

Change-Point Detection of Peak Tibial Acceleration in Overground Running Retraining

Sex‐ and age‐related differences in kinetics and tibial accelerations during military‐relevant movement tasks in U.S. Army trainees

A Primer on Wearable Technology for Injury Risk Management in Distance Running

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About