2005
DOI: 10.1080/1566097042000265791
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity and reliability of responses to a self-report home safety survey designed for use in a community-based child injury prevention programme

Abstract: In view of these limitations in the accuracy of CATI risk factor surveys, their use for priority setting and evaluation in community-based injury prevention programs needs to be considered with caution.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There is evidence of good internal consistency and test-retest reliability for self-report data. However, the evidence regarding validity, while still relatively positive, is less encouraging, with respondents showing a tendency to overestimate their self-reported safety behaviours in comparison to the observed rates of behaviour (Mason, Christoffel, & Sinacore, 2007;Yorkston, Turner, Schluter, & McClure, 2005). In our study there is no real way of telling how much social desirability has influenced responses.…”
Section: Limitationscontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…There is evidence of good internal consistency and test-retest reliability for self-report data. However, the evidence regarding validity, while still relatively positive, is less encouraging, with respondents showing a tendency to overestimate their self-reported safety behaviours in comparison to the observed rates of behaviour (Mason, Christoffel, & Sinacore, 2007;Yorkston, Turner, Schluter, & McClure, 2005). In our study there is no real way of telling how much social desirability has influenced responses.…”
Section: Limitationscontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…Previous research indicates that comparable information in injury studies can be collected via these mixed modes [24]. …”
Section: Design Methods and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason for this discrepancy could likely be the setting of the initial interview, via telephone in advance of the home observation in the 2003 study as opposed to in the home at the time of home observation in the present study. The validity of respondent-reported home safety behaviours has been seen to decrease when questions are asked over telephone rather than in the home 7 8 10. Overall, self-report of SA coverage has shown troublingly low validity, and research that needs to rely on self-report to evaluate programmes or monitor trends should bear in mind the degree to which there is error in such measurement, especially with regard to which population groups may be at increased risk for incorrectly reporting their levels of protection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%