2010
DOI: 10.3390/rel1010086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity and Reliability of the Hebrew Version of the SpREUK Questionnaire for Religiosity, Spirituality and Health: An Application for Oral Diseases

Abstract: Abstract:Background: Research has examined the connection between religiosity, spirituality (SpR) and health, and the potential of these variables to prevent, heal and cope with disease. Research indicated that participation in religious meetings or services was associated with a lower risk of developing oral disease. We intended to test a Hebrew version of the SpREUK 1.1 questionnaire, which is reported to be a reliable and valid measure of distinctive issues of SpR, and to test its relevance in the context o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Behavioural data included tooth brushing, use of oral hygiene aids and tobacco smoking status. Level of spirituality was estimated by the validated Hebrew version of the spiritual and religious attitudes in dealing with illness (SpREUK) questionnaire for religiosity, spirituality and health (28,29). Social support was assessed by the validated Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS; 30,31).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Behavioural data included tooth brushing, use of oral hygiene aids and tobacco smoking status. Level of spirituality was estimated by the validated Hebrew version of the spiritual and religious attitudes in dealing with illness (SpREUK) questionnaire for religiosity, spirituality and health (28,29). Social support was assessed by the validated Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS; 30,31).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sample included married adult Jewish people aged 35-44 years living in Jerusalem. Selection procedures were described in a previous publication [Zini et al, 2010a[Zini et al, , 2012. The age range was chosen according to the recommendation of the WHO for assessing the full effect of caries experience in the adult population [World Health Organization, 1997].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the existing spirituality evaluation measures, the Spiritual and Religious Attitudes in Dealing with Illness (SpREUK; Büssing, 2010;Büssing, Ostermann, & Matthiessen, 2005) is a relevant instrument designed to evaluate the chronic patient's perceptions of the impact of spirituality on health and how to deal with the disease. Currently, there are different versions of SpREUK as a result of its initial version´s optimization processthe 25-item version (SpREUK 1.1), the 18-item version (SpREUK 1.2), the 16-item version (SpREUK 1.2b), the 15-item version (SpREUK-15), the 10item version (SpREUK-SF10), already tested in the German context with secular patients (Büssing, 2010;Büssing, Osterman, & Koenig, 2007;Büssing et al, 2005), Arabic Muslims (Büssing, Abu-Hassan, Matthiessen, & Osterman, 2007), Orthodox Jews (Zini, Büssing, & Sgan-Cohen, 2010) and, more recently, in the Polish context with predominantly catholic clinical population (Büssing, Franczak, Surzykiewick, 2016). The most widely used version is the short version of 15 items that evaluates three independent dimensions: (i) Search for support/access to spirituality, (ii) Trust in higher guidance/source and (iii) Reflection and positive interpretation of disease.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%