2020
DOI: 10.3906/sag-2001-155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Multidimensional Dyspnea Profile in outpatients with respiratory disease

Abstract: Background/aim: Dyspnea is the subjective feeling of breathing discomfort and a significant problem for patients with heart and respiratory disease and also an important determinant of exercise tolerance, quality of life, and mortality in various diseases. Most of the scales are not enough to investigate the multidimensional effects of dyspnea; therefore, the Multidimensional Dyspnea Profile (MDP) was developed and validated into many languages. This study was aimed to translate and culturally adapt the MDP in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Factor structure and internal consistency Psychometric aspects were available with 27 datasets (D-12 n=17 or MDP n=10), including the original development studies [4,77] and language translations (D-12 n= 8, MDP n= 3) (Supplemental materials Table S4). The two-factor structure was confirmed by five independent studies for the D-12 [7,20,33,43,44] and six independent studies for the MDP [7,57,61,69,86,87]. [Figure 1]…”
Section: Psychometric Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Factor structure and internal consistency Psychometric aspects were available with 27 datasets (D-12 n=17 or MDP n=10), including the original development studies [4,77] and language translations (D-12 n= 8, MDP n= 3) (Supplemental materials Table S4). The two-factor structure was confirmed by five independent studies for the D-12 [7,20,33,43,44] and six independent studies for the MDP [7,57,61,69,86,87]. [Figure 1]…”
Section: Psychometric Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Studies were conducted across 18 different countries, with the most frequent being the United Kingdom, United States of America and France. Language translations with psychometric assessments were reported for the D-12 in eight studies (Korean [45], French [24], Brazilian Portuguese [25], Spanish [26], Arabic [38,39], Italian [27], Swedish [20]) and for the MDP in three studies (Brazilian Portuguese [56], Swedish [57], Turkish [86]). The D-12 was more commonly used in observational/descriptive approaches (24 datasets, 73%), whereas the MDP was more frequently used to assess intervention effects ( 18datasets, 49%).…”
Section: Study Focus and Designsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation