2019
DOI: 10.1177/2150132719844062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity and Reliability of the Exercise Vital Sign Questionnaire in an Ethnically Diverse Group: A Pilot Study

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to determine the validity and reliability of the Exercise Vital Sign (EVS) questionnaire in an ethnically diverse sample. Participants (N = 39) were asked to wear an accelerometer at the hip for at least 7 days and to complete the EVS at the beginning (T1) and end (T2) of the wear period. The EVS questionnaire validity was determined against accelerometry, and bias was calculated as the mean difference between measures. The sensitivity and specificity of the EVS questionnaire were… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(44 reference statements)
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These measurements were made using a self-administered online form of the Exercise Vital Sign Questionnaire (EVS). The EVS questionnaire has acceptable validity (sensitivity=56-59% and specificity=77-78%) and excellent reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.99) (Golightly et al, 2017;Quiles et al, 2019). Additionally, it was utilized to minimize recall bias because it only consists of two questions about structured PA in each period, which are expected to be easily recalled (Falkner et al, 1999).…”
Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These measurements were made using a self-administered online form of the Exercise Vital Sign Questionnaire (EVS). The EVS questionnaire has acceptable validity (sensitivity=56-59% and specificity=77-78%) and excellent reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.99) (Golightly et al, 2017;Quiles et al, 2019). Additionally, it was utilized to minimize recall bias because it only consists of two questions about structured PA in each period, which are expected to be easily recalled (Falkner et al, 1999).…”
Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The questionnaire contained five sections, two of which were optional (this was to maximise our responses for the primary objectives). Socio-demographic data, including age category, gender, ethnicity and job role, views about the use of sit-stand desks within general practice, and participation in physical activity (17) were completed first. These were then followed by optional questions about the number of hours worked and total time spent sitting at work each day, and items relating health and wellbeing, including height, weight, feelings of burnout (18), musculoskeletal health (19), and psychological wellbeing (20).…”
Section: Questionnaire Themesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional outcomes assessed include post-infectious sequelae (e.g., dyspnea, cough) [34][35][36], post-traumatic stress disorder (PC-PTSD-5) [37], and exercise (exercise vital sign; 2 question survey to assess habitual physical activity) [38][39][40], using previously validated questionnaires .…”
Section: Variables and Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…post-traumatic stress disorder (PC-PTSD-5) [37], and exercise (exercise vital sign; 2 question survey to assess habitual physical activity) [38][39][40], using previously validated questionnaires .…”
Section: Comorbiditiesmentioning
confidence: 99%