2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2005.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity and reliability of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in a hypertrophic cardiomyopathy clinic: the HADS in a cardiomyopathy population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
70
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
70
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This notion is supported by a recent study which has found that the HADS and Beck Inventories may not be valid measures of psychiatric illness in OP-exposed participants (Harrison & Mackenzie Ross, under review); nor in many other patient groups with concurrent ill-health symptoms (e.g. Golden et al, 2007;Mitchell et al, 2010;Poole et al, 2006;Watson et al, 2014). Thus it is unclear how meaningful the information derived from self-report measures is in clinical, or real-world terms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This notion is supported by a recent study which has found that the HADS and Beck Inventories may not be valid measures of psychiatric illness in OP-exposed participants (Harrison & Mackenzie Ross, under review); nor in many other patient groups with concurrent ill-health symptoms (e.g. Golden et al, 2007;Mitchell et al, 2010;Poole et al, 2006;Watson et al, 2014). Thus it is unclear how meaningful the information derived from self-report measures is in clinical, or real-world terms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although self-report measures may be useful for screening purposes in large populations, it is not always clear whether findings are comparable with what would be derived from structured clinical interviews undertaken by mental health professionals using internationally agreed diagnostic criteria for mental disorders. Indeed, previous research with other patient cohorts (including multiple sclerosis, cancer, cardiomyopathy, hepatitis C) has shown that self-report measures may not be good indictors of psychiatric disorder (Golden et al, 2007;Mitchell et al, 2010;Poole et al, 2006;Watson et al, 2014), and a recent study suggests this may be particularly true for research with OP exposed groups (Harrison & Mackenzie Ross, under review). Structured interviews standardise the coverage of specific psychiatric issues (thus reducing the possibility of missed diagnoses) and require the systematic appraisal of relevant symptoms, to reduce misdiagnosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 In this study, a cutoff of 8 points was used for each subscale, as previously reported in a HCM population, providing high sensitivity though lower specificty. 8 For this reason, the cutoffs used in this study indicate that the individual is at high risk of having an emotional disorder, and referral to a psychologist may be necessary.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Each subscale includes 7 items, generating possible scores of 0 to 21 for anxiety (Cronbach's α = 0.89) and depression (Cronbach's α = 0.91). A score of 8 and above is widely used to indicate the presence of clinical levels of anxiety or depression that may warrant further psychological investigation (41,42). Post-traumatic stress (PTS) symptoms related to receiving an intravitreal injection was assessed by the Impact of Events Scale-Revised (IES-R) (43).…”
Section: Measures For Quantitative Strandmentioning
confidence: 99%