2014
DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2014-0453
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity and reliability of the 13C-methionine breath test for the detection of moderate hyperhomocysteinemia in Mexican adults; statistical issues in validity and reliability analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, possibility of getting exactly the same crude agreement of a variable between methods with no reliability at all is high. 2,3,9 As the authors pointed out in their conclusion, overall, the ISCIMSBDS is reliable. Such conclusions may be a misleading message due to inappropriate use of statistical tests.…”
mentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In other words, possibility of getting exactly the same crude agreement of a variable between methods with no reliability at all is high. 2,3,9 As the authors pointed out in their conclusion, overall, the ISCIMSBDS is reliable. Such conclusions may be a misleading message due to inappropriate use of statistical tests.…”
mentioning
confidence: 70%
“…1 Regarding reliability, it is crucial to know that an individual-based approach instead of group-based (crude agreement) should be considered. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] The reason is in reliability assessment; we should consider individual results and not global average. In other words, possibility of getting exactly the same crude agreement of a variable between methods with no reliability at all is high.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6][7][8][9][10] It is crucial to know that to assess validity, sensitivity, specificity,) positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), the most appropriate tests are likelihood ratio positive and likelihood ratio negative as well as diagnostic accuracy and odds ratio. [6][7][8][9][10] Kerlin et al concluded that prospective surveillance using VAE criteria is more reliable than traditional VAP surveillance and clinical VAP diagnosis; the correlation between VAEs and clinically recognized pulmonary deterioration is poor. Such a conclusion may be misleading due to the inappropriate use of a statistical test to assess reliability and validity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of quantitative variables, depending on the distribution of the variable, the Pearson r or Spearman rho can be applied. Therefore, to assess reproducibility and accuracy, appropriate tests as well as correct interpretations should be considered [2][3][4][5].In this letter, I emphasized methodological and statistical issues in reproducibility and accuracy analysis. Papp and colleagues concluded that the Etest method yielded reproducible MIC values within each laboratory, with the azithromycin and ceftriaxone MIC results being consistent with the reference agar dilution method.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of quantitative variables, depending on the distribution of the variable, the Pearson r or Spearman rho can be applied. Therefore, to assess reproducibility and accuracy, appropriate tests as well as correct interpretations should be considered [2][3][4][5].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%