Validity and reliability of the Thai version of the Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes Questionnaire version 2.0 to assess Quality of Life in Patients with Spinal Metastasis

Luksanapruksa, Panya; Phikunsri, Pariwat; Trathitephun, Warayos; Santipas, Borriwat; Suvithayasiri, Siravich; Wattanapaiboon, Komkrich; Wilartratsami, Sirichai

doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2021.05.010

Cited by 7 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Three instruments were assessed for reliability (Table 4 ). The test-retest reliability was assessed in eight studies 11 , 28 – 31 , 36 , 38 , 39 . One study used the TOST test to assess reliability, but it did not report the accurate value 35 .…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Measurement properties of health-related quality of life measures for people living with metastatic disease of the spine: a systematic review

Qiao,

Ding,

et al. 2023

International Journal of Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: Patients with spinal metastases (SM) suffer from a significant quality of life (QoL) deterioration. The measurement of QoL has garnered significant attention. In this study, we aimed to investigate the frequency of QoL measurement, systematically appraise the measurement properties of identified instruments, and facilitate the effective selection of an appropriate QoL instrument for patients with SM. Methods: This systematic review adhered to the newly revised Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement guidelines. The methodological quality of studies was assessed using the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) checklist. Measurement property results were assessed using the adapted criteria. Each measurement property was allocated a separate rating (excellent, good, fair, or poor). “Best evidence synthesis” was performed using COSMIN outcomes and the quality of findings. Result: Two hundred and nine publications were included, and 18 instruments were identified. ECOG, EuroQol-5D, SF-36, SOSGOQ, and EORTC-QLQ-C30 were the top five instruments used for patients with SM in published literature. The measurement properties evaluated included internal consistency (four instruments), reliability (three instruments), validity (five instruments), validity (nine measures), floor and ceiling effects (four instruments), responsiveness (four instruments), and interpretability (three measures). Based on the limited evidence, Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) had the best methodological quality. Conclusions: Owing to the limitation of BPI in assessment domains, we cannot fully support the use of BPI. For the lack of high-quality research, it is challenging to nominate a single appropriate measure. Additional studies needed to explore the evidence before a confirmatory decision is made.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Measurement properties of health-related quality of life measures for people living with metastatic disease of the spine: a systematic review

Qiao,

Ding,

et al. 2023

International Journal of Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…21,24 The potential improvement in the follow-up and evaluation of the impact of spinal neoplasms using the SOSG-OQ has led several authors to translate it into their native languages. Luksanapruksa et al 32 performed the translation and cross-cultural adaptation into Thai, and they reported that the domains pf the translated version maintained a high internal consistency (Cronbach alpha > 0.7) and that the questionnaire presented a strong correlation with the 5-Level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Likewise, Brodano et al 33 reported the validity of the Italian version in terms of the internal domains and their correlation with the SF-36 subdomains, as well as a high consistency among questionnaire items.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Devido ao possível benefício de melhorar o acompanhamento e a avaliação do impacto das neoplasias na coluna fornecido pelo SOSG-OQ, diversos autores passaram a traduzi-lo para suas línguas nativas. Luksanapruksa et al 32 realizaram a tradução e adaptação transcultural para o tailandês, e demonstraram que os domínios da versão traduzida mantiveram uma alta consistência interna (alpha de Cronbach > 0.7), e que o questionário manteve forte correlação com as pontuações obtidas na versão de 5 níveis do EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Da mesma forma, Brodano et al, 33 demostraram a validade da versão italiana tanto em relação aos domínios internos quanto à sua correlação com os subdomínios do SF-36, além da alta consistência entre os itens do questionário.…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

Tradução e adaptação transcultural do questionário SOSG-OQ 2.0 para o português brasileiro

Batista,

Pokorny,

Bitencourt Júnior

et al. 2024

Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Resumo Objetivo: Realizar a adaptação transcultural e a tradução para o português brasileiro da versão 2.0 do Questionário de Desfechos do Spine Oncology Study Group (Spine Oncology Study Group – Outcomes Questionnaire 2.0, SOSG-OQ 2.0, em inglês) para viabilizar sua aplicação em pacientes brasileiros e permitir a utilização deste questionário que está em voga na literatura científica por pesquisadores brasileiros. Materiais e Métodos: Trata-se de uma pesquisa básica, não randomizada, não comparativa. As etapas de tradução foram realizadas conforme propostas por Reichenheime e Moraes, principalmente as sessões de equivalência semântica e equivalência de mensuração, e também foram seguidas as recomendações de Coster e Mancini, principalmente na etapa de tradução. As etapas foram as seguintes: primeira – tradução do questionário para o português brasileiro; segunda – retroversão; terceira – comparação semântica; e quarta – validação final do constructo. Resultados: As traduções do SOSG-OQ 2.0 feitas por três tradutores apresentaram grande similaridade na maioria das questões. Todos os títulos e subtítulos de perguntas foram mantidos pelos tradutores, assim como as ordens interna e externa das perguntas. A retroversão da tradução conciliada foi realizada por dois tradutores juramentados, com fluência nativa na língua inglesa. Ambas as retroversões foram bastante similares, as divergências foram sanadas por consenso entre o autor principal e os tradutores juramentados, e a versão traduzida foi considerada a versão final. Conclusão: Neste estudo, apresenta-se uma versão traduzida do SOSG-OQ 2.0 que tem validade semântica com a versão original publicada em inglês, o que permite a sua aplicação na população brasileira, e acrescenta mais uma ferramenta para que os cirurgiões de coluna possam acompanhar de forma melhor este complexo grupo de pacientes.

show abstract

“…Following the same guidelines, recently Luksanapruksa et al 7 have published a Thai version of SOSGOQ 2.0 validating it with a sample of 68 patients and Datzmann et al 10 have published a German version of SOSGOQ 2.0.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Adaptation and Validation of the Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes Questionnaire in Italian Language

Bròdano

Pesce

Griffoni

et al. 2022

Global Spine Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Study design Prospective observational study Objective The population of patients with advanced stages of cancer, including metastatic spinal disease, is growing because of better treatment options allowing for longer control of disease. The main goal of treatment for these patients is to improve or maintain their health-related quality of life (HRQOL). A spine oncology-specific outcome measure has been developed by the Spine Oncology Study Group and validated through international studies. We proposed to translate and validate the questionnaire in Italian language. Methods The cross-cultural adaptation of the questionnaire has been performed according to guidelines previously proposed. After this process, an observational prospective study has been conducted to validate the efficacy of SOSGOQ in Italian language. SOSGOQ has been compared to SF-36 (Short Form Health Survey-36), a generic validated questionnaire to assess HRQOL. Starting from January 2020, SOSGOQ and SF-36 questionnaires were auto-administered to 150 patients affected by spinal metastases who provided written informed consent for study participation. Results The confirmatory factor analysis on the 4 domains examined showed a good model fit (comparative fit index, .95; RMSEA .07 (90% CI, .05-.09) and SRMR, .05), endorsing construct validity. The analysis of concurrent validity demonstrated strong correlation for physical function, pain and mental health domains with the corresponding domain scores of SF-36. The reliability across item was high with a Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of .91. Conclusions The statistical analysis of the results will allow to accept the Italian version of SOSGOQ as a specific and efficient tool to measure HRQOL in Italian-speaking patients affected by spinal metastases.

show abstract

Validity and reliability of the Thai version of the Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes Questionnaire version 2.0 to assess Quality of Life in Patients with Spinal Metastasis

Cited by 7 publications

References 18 publications

Measurement properties of health-related quality of life measures for people living with metastatic disease of the spine: a systematic review

Measurement properties of health-related quality of life measures for people living with metastatic disease of the spine: a systematic review

Tradução e adaptação transcultural do questionário SOSG-OQ 2.0 para o português brasileiro

Adaptation and Validation of the Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes Questionnaire in Italian Language

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About