Objective: To compare the validity of a modified Block food-frequency questionnaire (FFQ), a picture-sort administration of the FFQ (PSFFQ) and a meal pattern-based questionnaire (MPQ) in a multi-ethnic population of low socio-economic status (SES). Design: Participants completed six 24-hour dietary recalls (24HR) over six months; the FFQ, PSFFQ and MPQ were completed in random order in the subsequent month. Instruments were interviewer-administered. The PSFFQ and MPQ were developed in formative research concerning difficulties for older adults in responding to standard food-frequency instruments. Setting: Rural North Carolina, USA. Subjects: One hundred and twenty-two African American, Native American and white adults aged $ 65 years, with approximately one-third in each ethnic group. Inclusion criteria included education # 12 years and income # 150% of national poverty level or Medicaid recipient. Results: Comparing median intakes from the average of the 24HR with the three diet assessment instruments, the MPQ tended to overestimate intakes compared with the FFQ and PSFFQ. Correlations among nutrients obtained by the 24HR and the other three instruments were generally statistically significant and positive. Across nutrients, the PSFFQ was most highly correlated with the 24HR for women, while the FFQ was most highly correlated with the 24HR for men. Conclusions: Dietary assessments using 24HR and FFQ were similar to results reported elsewhere, although correlations between 24HR and FFQ were somewhat lower. Interviewer-administered dietary assessments should be used with caution to evaluate dietary intake among older adults with low SES. Gender differences and the lower correlations should be investigated more thoroughly to assist in choosing dietary assessment instruments for this population. Attempts to reduce health disparities in diet-related chronic diseases and their risk factors require valid and reliable diet assessment tools that can be used in diverse segments of the population. The most commonly used measures in epidemiological studies are food-frequency questionnaires (FFQs), as they can reflect long-term intake, have relatively low respondent burden, and can be either self-or interviewer-administered. The FFQ technique poses a mental challenge for some respondents, asking them to compute averages of what may be seasonally or otherwise varied intake 1 . This is likely to be more problematic for some groups than others. Validation studies of the most commonly used FFQs have generally been conducted with well-educated groups of white women and men 2 -4 . Correlation coefficients with estimates of nutrient intake collected from multiple days of diet recalls or records typically range from 0.40 to 0.70. These values have been accepted as indicative of the ability of the FFQ to rank individuals correctly according to categories of nutrient intake 5 . However, validation data from other populations (e.g. minority, low education) are scarce. Population subgroups with low socio-economic status (SES)...