2018
DOI: 10.1177/0269215518791000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity and reproducibility of the Functional Gait Assessment in persons after stroke

Abstract: The FGA demonstrated good measurement properties in persons after stroke and yielded no ceiling effect in contrast to other capacity measures. In clinical practice, a measurement error of 6 points should be taken into account in interpreting changes in walking balance.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8,12,14,33,35 A possible explanation could be the high level of heterogeneity in mobility in the included participants with Parkinson’s disease, indicated by the relatively large standard deviation of 22 points for the reliability sample (35% of the mean score). The standard error of measurement of 7.5 points, however, was acceptable 29 and there was no item with absolute agreement <70%. Provided that all assessors carefully synchronize before clinical use, the de Morton Mobility Index can be reliably administered by different assessors in hospital patients with Parkinson’s disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…8,12,14,33,35 A possible explanation could be the high level of heterogeneity in mobility in the included participants with Parkinson’s disease, indicated by the relatively large standard deviation of 22 points for the reliability sample (35% of the mean score). The standard error of measurement of 7.5 points, however, was acceptable 29 and there was no item with absolute agreement <70%. Provided that all assessors carefully synchronize before clinical use, the de Morton Mobility Index can be reliably administered by different assessors in hospital patients with Parkinson’s disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…22 The standard error of measurement (SEM AGREEMENT ) was calculated 27 and deemed satisfactory if it was ⩽10% of the total scale range (100 points). 29 The absolute and relative agreement between both raters per item was calculated as percentage (%) and as weighted kappa with linear weights (ƙ), respectively. 27 Agreement per item equal to or above 70% and ƙ ⩾0.70 were considered acceptable.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The secondary outcomes of the efficacy study were additional spatiotemporal gait parameters (step time asymmetry index, single-leg stance time asymmetry index, stride length, and stride time) for the barefoot and shod conditions, 34-36 walking capacity measures (walking balance measured with the Functional Gait Assessment 37,38 and comfortable gait speed calculated from the 10-Meter Walk Test 37 ), and balance control measured with the Berg Balance Scale. 39 Furthermore, fear of falling was evaluated by the Falls Efficacy Scale I (score range 16-64) and assessed only at 3-month follow-up.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…39 The standard error of measurement (SEM AGREEMENT ) was calculated and deemed satisfactory if it was ≤ 10% of the total scale range (100 DEMMI points). 47,44 The absolute and relative agreement between both raters per DEMMI item was calculated as a percentage (%) and as the weighted kappa with linear weights ( ). 44 Agreement per item equal or above 70% and ≥ 0.70 was considered acceptable.…”
Section: Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%