1999
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1999.tb01297.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity and Responsiveness of the Minimum Data Set

Abstract: These data demonstrate reasonable criterion validity of the MDS and the MMSE, ADL, and behavior rating scales and suggest that the MDS data is of adequate validity for research purposes in these areas. The MDS was less able to capture dementia-related change in ADLs in this population of patients with dementia even though the same nursing home staff completing the MDS often supplied the information for completing the research scales. As a result, the MDS may be limited as an outcome assessment instrument.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
85
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
85
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After admission, the Minimum Data Set (MDS) is assessed quarterly for patients in the nursing home or assisted living tiers. The MDS assesses the patient in multiple spheres of functioning, including cognitive function (Snowden et al, 1999). If the MDS cognitive questions indicate impairment, further assessment and workup are initiated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After admission, the Minimum Data Set (MDS) is assessed quarterly for patients in the nursing home or assisted living tiers. The MDS assesses the patient in multiple spheres of functioning, including cognitive function (Snowden et al, 1999). If the MDS cognitive questions indicate impairment, further assessment and workup are initiated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This ADL score measures functional disability based on four factors: locomotion, toilet use, eating and personal hygiene. The score ranges from zero to six, where zero represents being totally independent and six totally dependent (Morris et al, 1999;Snowden et al, 1999). This variable was dichotomized (0-3 ¼ not totally dependent, 4-6 ¼ dependent).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 The validity of MDS Section E items specifically has been examined in at least 4 reports by comparing the MDS data with those collected via previously validated instruments in samples with varying levels of cognitive impairment. [9][10][11][12] Investigators have reported correlation coefficients of r = 0.24 (day shift) to 0.37 (evening shift) with the total scores on the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI), r = 0.54 with the Psychogeriatric Dependency Rating Scale (PGDRS), and r = 0.50 with the Alzheimer's Disease Patient Registry Behavior Checklist as the comparative instruments. An additional report has documented significantly lower prevalence of behaviors as measured by the MDS compared with certified nursing assistants' ratings on the Revised Memory and Behavior Problem Checklist (RMBPC).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%