2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00776-008-1292-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity and responsiveness of the Oxford hip score in a prospective study with Japanese total hip arthroplasty patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
35
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The score can range from 12 to 60, with lower scores reflecting better functioning or well-being, and includes structured pain and functional domains. The reliability and validity of the OHS have been confirmed by previous studies (Dawson et al, 2001;Uesugi et al, 2009).…”
Section: Questionnairessupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The score can range from 12 to 60, with lower scores reflecting better functioning or well-being, and includes structured pain and functional domains. The reliability and validity of the OHS have been confirmed by previous studies (Dawson et al, 2001;Uesugi et al, 2009).…”
Section: Questionnairessupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Quality of life studies conducted in England, Scotland, Switzerland, New Zealand, Sweden, the Netherlands, Japan, etc. related to hip joint replacements also highlight the highest percentage of women in the sample: 58% [19], 62% [20], 64% [21], etc.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been reported to be difficult to assess appropriately any decrease in activities of daily living due to a limited ROM using the OHS in cultures that require deep flexion of the hip joint. 17 Therefore, the JHEQ is suitable for populations leading an Asian lifestyle, and it is also useful in Western populations where deep flexion movements are required in activities of daily living. Our findings indicate that the optimal effect of THA for patients with hip disease is a decrease in pain, because the improvement rate for the JHEQ pain subscale was higher than the rate for the movement or mental subscales, and the improvement rate for satisfaction had the strongest correlation with the improvement rate of the pain subscale of all of the 3 subscales.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%