2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2022.102384
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity and utility of HER2/ERBB2 copy number variation assessed in liquid biopsies from breast cancer patients: A systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of them studied circulating tumor ctDNA with disease-free survival in patients with BC, 148 another described the clinical uses of LB in BC, 149 and the last one reported the validity of HER2/ERBB2 copy number variation in LB from BC patients. 150 This is the first SR aimed at establishing the main biomarkers obtained by LB, useful for the early diagnosis of BC. This evidence is highly relevant because the identification of biomarkers in the early diagnosis of BC would undoubtedly be valuable in reducing mortality rates resulting from this neoplasm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of them studied circulating tumor ctDNA with disease-free survival in patients with BC, 148 another described the clinical uses of LB in BC, 149 and the last one reported the validity of HER2/ERBB2 copy number variation in LB from BC patients. 150 This is the first SR aimed at establishing the main biomarkers obtained by LB, useful for the early diagnosis of BC. This evidence is highly relevant because the identification of biomarkers in the early diagnosis of BC would undoubtedly be valuable in reducing mortality rates resulting from this neoplasm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further bias in HER2 assessment may result from sampling errors [56] . In the case of metastatic recurrence, guidelines recommend repeating HER2 testing in a metastatic site, if tissue sample is available, although a new biopsy cannot always be feasible [8] .…”
Section: Technical Pitfallsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of metastatic recurrence, guidelines recommend repeating HER2 testing in a metastatic site, if tissue sample is available, although a new biopsy cannot always be feasible [ 8 ] . Additionally, false-negative results can be caused by technical pitfalls, as frequently occurs in bone lesions, or by sampling bias due to intratumor heterogeneity [ 57 ] .…”
Section: Technical Pitfallsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Prior to the introduction of HER2-targeted drugs such as trastuzumab and patolizumab, HER2-positive patients had high recurrence rates and poor survival outcomes (3,5). Trastuzumab considerably increased progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with early and advanced HER2-positive breast cancer, according to landmark trial data till 2006 (5)(6)(7).. An accurate evaluation of HER2 status is essential in the treatment of breast cancer since HER2-targeted therapy is only effective in tumors with HER2 overexpression and/ or gene amplification (7)(8)(9).. Currently, in situ hybridization to assess HER2 gene amplification and immunohistochemistry (IHC) to assess protein overexpression are still the primary methods to detect HER2 expression status (10,11).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%