1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0924-977x(99)80576-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity and utility of the cognitive drug research (CDR) computerised cognitive testing system: A review following fifteen years of usage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The power of attention factor, a measure of allocation of attentional processing to a particular task, combined the speed scores (reflective of concentration intensity) from the simple reaction time, choice reaction time, and the digit vigilance tasks. 50,52 The quality of working memory factor indicated the capacity to hold information, without having learnt it beforehand, temporarily in the two subsystems of working memory, the articulatory loop, and the visual-spatial scratchpad. 52 This factor score was derived from the sum of the numeric working memory sensitivity and spatial working memory sensitivity scores.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The power of attention factor, a measure of allocation of attentional processing to a particular task, combined the speed scores (reflective of concentration intensity) from the simple reaction time, choice reaction time, and the digit vigilance tasks. 50,52 The quality of working memory factor indicated the capacity to hold information, without having learnt it beforehand, temporarily in the two subsystems of working memory, the articulatory loop, and the visual-spatial scratchpad. 52 This factor score was derived from the sum of the numeric working memory sensitivity and spatial working memory sensitivity scores.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…51 These subtests were also chosen as a composite of previous research findings and pragmatics of time and practicality. 50,52 The CDR neuropsychological tasks involved two training sessions on separate days before the baseline to minimize practice effects.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The above measures were collapsed into four global outcome factors, and two sub-factors derived from the battery by factor analysis, as previously utilised (Kennedy et al, 2000(Kennedy et al, , 2001Wesnes et al, 1997Wesnes et al, ,1999Wesnes et al, , 2000.…”
Section: Primary Cognitive Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%