Validity, internal consistency reliability and one‐year stability of the <scp>S</scp>lovene translation of the <scp>M</scp>easure of <scp>P</scp>rocesses of <scp>C</scp>are (20‐item version)

Sršen, Katja Groleger; Vidmar, Gaj; Zupan, Anton

doi:10.1111/cch.12198

Cited by 7 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 38 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…To increase the reliability and validity of the measurement tools, this study uses SPSS 23.0 software to individually evaluate each item, confirm that the items measure the same concept and form an intrinsically consistent scale, and exclude items that do not meet this standard [55]. The corrected item-total correlation is used to analyze the items in both scales of this study [56]. The analysis reveals high discrimination and homogeneity in low-carbon travel motivation and low-carbon travel constraint items.…”

Section: Item Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

Low-Carbon Travel Motivation and Constraint: Scales Development and Validation

Dai

Shie

Chu

et al. 2022

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Low-carbon travel has emerged as a topic of interest in tourism and academia. Studies have offered reasons tourists may engage in low-carbon travel; however, these explanations are scattered throughout the literature and have yet to be integrated into low-carbon travel motivation and constraint constructs. This study develops a low-carbon travel motivation scale (LCTMS) and a low-carbon travel constraint scale (LCTCS). It performs reliability and validity testing to measure the low-carbon travel motives and obstacles. Items were collected primarily by literature review, and, then, by surveys of 382 tourists from low-carbon travel destinations and 390 from non-low-carbon travel destinations. Through a rigorous scale development process, this study identifies six dimensions of the LCTMS (environmental protection, experience-seeking, escape or social connection, industry pleas and measures for environmental protection, low-carbon products, and green transportation) and four dimensions of the LCTCS (intrapersonal constraints, interpersonal constraints, structural constraints, and the not a travel option).

show abstract

Section: Item Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

Low-Carbon Travel Motivation and Constraint: Scales Development and Validation

Dai

Shie

Chu

et al. 2022

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The tool has been studied in several countries for its validity and reliability, including in the Netherlands [5], Norway [6], Japan [7], Korea [8], Brazil [9], Jordan [10], Slovenia [11], and Malaysia [12]. In addition, the validity and reliability of this instrument have been specifically performed on a group of diseases, such as cancer and epilepsy [13,14].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Measure of Processes of Care 20-item (MPOC-20): Validity and Reliability of the Persian Version

Broujeni

Rezaee

Azar

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: Family-centered services are collections for children with special needs and their families. These services consider families as expert about children's needs. The essence of this approach is involvement of family in decision making, cooperation, and mutual communication (family and therapist), mutual respect, acceptance of family choice, family support, flexibility of service, and effort to empower families. These services have become a basic foundation of many early intervention programs and are especially useful in rehabilitation services. MPOC-20 is one of the questionnaires used to evaluate these services. This questionnaire consists 20 questions divided into 5 areas, the areas include the following: 1) enabling and partnership, 2) providing general information, 3) providing specific information about the child, 4) coordinated and comprehensive care for child and family, and 5) respectful and supportive care. This tool has been translated and validated in several countries and specifically in several diseases. In this study, the validity and reliability of this tool have been investigated. Materials & Methods: This study was a descriptive-analytical and in order to measure the validity and reliability of MPOC-20, content validity, correlation coefficient and reliability of the test-retest were done. To determine the content validity, 14 occupational therapists were asked and the result was calculated by measuring the content validity index and content validity Ratio. Then, an MPOC-20 questionnaire along with a form of demographic information and a consent form were given to 340 parents of children (children under 18 years and with different diagnosis) in clinics of Tehran. The articipants consisted of 142 girls patients (42%) and 198 boys (58%) randomly selected from public and private rehabilitation centers in different regions of Tehran. A large percentage of respondents were mothers (314 people were 92.4%). After 2 weeks, the questionnaire was again distributed among 30 of them, and the ICC coefficients were calculated. In order to determine the internal consistency, Cronbach's alpha was calculated. Results: The content validity index and content validity Ratio for all items were acceptable and no items were deleted. Cronbach's alpha was 0.81 which indicates a high correlation between items in the questionnaire. The highest Cronbach's alpha coefficient is related to the field of providing general information about the child (α=0.77). Also, in this section, the p-value was significant for all fields at the level of 0.001. In the reliability of the test-retest, the scores of the Intra-class correlation coefficient of all domains were higher than 0/6 which indicates a medium to good reliability of the questionnaire. Reliability in the field of supportive care had a high coefficient and good reliability. In other areas, the reliability was moderate. Conclusion: Considering the importance of evaluation in improvement of family-centered services provision, a strong tool is needed and MPOC-20 is well known in this regard. The results of this study showed that the Persian version of "MPOC-20" questionnaire has a good validity and reliability in children under the age of 18, and it can be used to assess family-centered services in both research studies and as clinical tool.

show abstract

Psychometric assessment of the Slovene translation of the Measure of Processes of Care for Service Providers

Sršen

Vidmar

2020

International Journal of Rehabilitation Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Measure of Processes of Care for professionals (MPOC-SP) is valid and reliable a self-administered questionnaire for paediatric service providers engaged in care for chronically ill children. Our aim was to evaluate internal consistency reliability, one-year stability and some aspects of validity of its Slovene translation. Sixty-seven service providers from seven professional groups of several hospitals and health centres participated in the study. MPOC-SP mean scores for all four subscales were high; their ranking order was the same as in other MPOC-SP studies. All subscales exhibited sufficient internal consistency (Cronbach alpha from 0.69 to 0.86, adequate corrected item-total correlations). None of the mean subscale scores changed significantly after one year (P values from 0.11 to 0.80). The Slovene translation of the MPOC-SP can therefore be considered a reliable instrument that shows good stability over a period of one year, and as such it can be adopted in clinical practice.

show abstract

Validity, internal consistency reliability and one‐year stability of the Slovene translation of the Measure of Processes of Care (20‐item version)

Abstract: The Slovene translation of the MPOC-20 can be considered as a valid and reliable instrument that shows good stability over a period of 1 year, and as such it can be adopted in clinical practice.

Cited by 7 publications

References 38 publications

Low-Carbon Travel Motivation and Constraint: Scales Development and Validation

Low-Carbon Travel Motivation and Constraint: Scales Development and Validation

The Measure of Processes of Care 20-item (MPOC-20): Validity and Reliability of the Persian Version

Psychometric assessment of the Slovene translation of the Measure of Processes of Care for Service Providers

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About