2015
DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmv039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity of a clinical model to predict influenza in patients presenting with symptoms of lower respiratory tract infection in primary care

Abstract: The Flu-Score attributes a small subgroup of patients with a high influenza risk (prevalence 32%). However, clinical usefulness is limited because this group is small and the association between predicted and observed risks is poor. Considerable diagnostic imprecision remains when it comes to differentiating those with influenza on clinical grounds from the many other causes of LRTI in primary care. New point of care tests are required that accurately, rapidly and cost effectively detect influenza in patients … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
14
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…CDRs have been useful in other acute respiratory infections such as pharyngitis 36 and pneumonia. 37 They typically classify patients as low, moderate, and high risk; these categories correspond to patients in whom disease is ruled out, Figure 3. Summary receiver operating characteristic curves for overall impression (A), whooping cough (B), paroxysmal cough (C), and posttussive vomiting (D), stratified by vaccination status.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CDRs have been useful in other acute respiratory infections such as pharyngitis 36 and pneumonia. 37 They typically classify patients as low, moderate, and high risk; these categories correspond to patients in whom disease is ruled out, Figure 3. Summary receiver operating characteristic curves for overall impression (A), whooping cough (B), paroxysmal cough (C), and posttussive vomiting (D), stratified by vaccination status.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approaches that develop clinical decision rules integrating signs, symptoms, and point-of-care tests such as CRP are particularly promising. 88 Finally, research is needed to determine if and when antibiotics are helpful, since data regarding treatment of B pertussis and M pneumoniae from well designed, adequately powered contemporary clinical trials are lacking.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[34] The clinical diagnosis of influenza is often difficult and unreliable and, where indicated, laboratory testing should be performed. [35] Situations where this is necessary include where there is a cluster of cases in institutions such as nursing homes, or in severe illness, where neuraminidase inhibitors (such as oseltamivir) are indicated. The latter appears to provide only marginal benefit in the non-hospitalised (in contrast to the hospitalised) patient in the community and is not recommended outside of highly immunocompromised patients or those with severe chronic respiratory, cardiac or neurological conditions.…”
Section: Influenzamentioning
confidence: 99%