2018
DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.3368
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity of a Novel Point-of-Care Troponin Assay for Single-Test Rule-Out of Acute Myocardial Infarction

Abstract: IMPORTANCE Emergency department (ED) investigations of patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are time consuming, partly because of the turnaround time of laboratory tests. Current point-of-care troponin assays shorten test turnaround times but lack precision at lower concentrations. Development of point-of-care troponin assays with greater analytical precision could reduce the decision-making time in EDs for ruling out AMI. OBJECTIVE To determine the clinical accuracy for AMI of a single tr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, lower specificity accompanies the increasing sensitivity of such tests results [46], so a clear understanding is required of the need for serial troponins in conjunction with interpretable ECGs for the accurate diagnosis of AMI. Point-of-care testing for troponins has made the rapid assessment of patients in remote areas easier, with the accuracy of these tests so improved in recent years that even single test troponin has comparable discrimination ability to a high sensitivity cardiac troponin assay for ruling out AMI after a single blood test [47].…”
Section: Challenges With Diagnosis-assessment and Management Of Patiementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, lower specificity accompanies the increasing sensitivity of such tests results [46], so a clear understanding is required of the need for serial troponins in conjunction with interpretable ECGs for the accurate diagnosis of AMI. Point-of-care testing for troponins has made the rapid assessment of patients in remote areas easier, with the accuracy of these tests so improved in recent years that even single test troponin has comparable discrimination ability to a high sensitivity cardiac troponin assay for ruling out AMI after a single blood test [47].…”
Section: Challenges With Diagnosis-assessment and Management Of Patiementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on clinical relevance shown in previous studies 3 5 , 20 , the Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction also recommended using the 99th-percentile URL of any assay to define myocardial injury, but at the same time it specifically highlighted myocardial injury as discrete from myocardial infarction 5 . Moreover, some investigators recently argued that a lower cut-off should be applied even for ruling out acute myocardial infarction 21 . In addition, the 99th-percentile URLs provided by immunoassay manufacturers are derived from a limited number of apparently healthy individuals 22 , and several factors such as age, sex, kidney and heart function, and the presence of inflammation that are known to affect troponin level are not considered 17 , 23 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Capillary arterialized blood samples (100 µl) were drawn from the earlobe and collected in heparinized tubes before (Pre), immediately after (Post) and on days 1 (D + 1) and 2 (D + 2) following each race to determine the time course of cTnI and CK-MB. The myocardial damage biomarkers concentrations were analyzed using the i-STAT R handheld analyzer (Abbott Point of Care, Inc., Princeton, NJ, United States), which was clinically validated (Pickering et al, 2018). The measurements were immediately made after collection using i-STAT cTnI and CK-MB cartridges.…”
Section: Biomarkers Of Cardiac Damagementioning
confidence: 99%