2016
DOI: 10.1080/14763141.2016.1213875
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity of a portable force platform for assessing biomechanical parameters in three different tasks

Abstract: The aim of this study was to determine the precision and accuracy of the vertical and anterior-posterior force components of the portable PASCO PS-2142 force plate. Impulse, peak force, and time to peak force were assessed and compared to a gold standard force plate in three different tasks: vertical jump, forward jump, and sprint start. Two healthy male participants performed ten trials for each task, resulting in 60 trials. Data analyses revealed good precision and accuracy for the vertical component of the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…With the growing interest in vertical jump testing in athlete performance monitoring [2], as well as the increased accessibility of technology such as portable force platforms [3,4,5,6,7], many new variables derived from a single vertical jump have arisen from the literature. Although the addition of new variables used to characterize jump performance is not necessarily negative, it does however present interpretation and evaluation challenges for practitioners.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the growing interest in vertical jump testing in athlete performance monitoring [2], as well as the increased accessibility of technology such as portable force platforms [3,4,5,6,7], many new variables derived from a single vertical jump have arisen from the literature. Although the addition of new variables used to characterize jump performance is not necessarily negative, it does however present interpretation and evaluation challenges for practitioners.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 The use of jumps testing using force plates has become increasingly popular, largely due to the fact software packages have been developed which are able to instantly calculate variables including: concentric and eccentric forces, rates of force development and absolute and relative forces. 13 Another commonly employed testing protocol in RU is the Wattbike 6 s maximal effort (WB6S), 1 which is a simple and valid measure of absolute and relative peak power output. 14 These jump and cycling tests have also been employed as load monitoring tools in RU.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, 11 different apps were tested, in which [ 15 , 19 , 28 , 32 , 37 , 42 ] studies were conducted using the My Jump and My Jump App 2, [ 17 , 18 , 27 , 30 , 34 , 38 , 44 , 46 ] the Powerlift, previously named Mylift, [ 36 ] the Ergo Arm Meter, [ 35 ] the Smartphone accelerometer, [ 33 , 41 ] the Speedclock App, [ 31 ] the MySprint App, [ 29 , 45 ] the ILoad, and [ 26 ] the Styrd App.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of neuromuscular power (or impulse), not only is weightlifting monitored but so are other movements for which height, flight time, or contact time are considered (e.g., jumping) [ 19 , 20 ]. For assessing strength and power, dynamometers [ 21 , 22 ], linear transducers [ 23 , 24 ], optoelectronic systems [ 25 , 26 ], or force plates [ 27 , 28 ] are usually used to measure the movements and their intensity [ 29 ]. In the case of running velocity (sprinting) or change-of-direction tests, the time of movement between two points is usually the common outcome [ 30 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%