2022
DOI: 10.1080/19411243.2022.2156426
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity of an Automated Handwriting Assessment in Occupational Therapy Settings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nine studies used classical statistical comparisons to identify discriminative features between groups (in blue in Table 4; [39,77,78,[80][81][82][83]87,91]). The others (in black in Table 4) used different algorithms of machine learning (Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, Convolutional Neuron Network, etc.)…”
Section: Handwriting Tools Based On the Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nine studies used classical statistical comparisons to identify discriminative features between groups (in blue in Table 4; [39,77,78,[80][81][82][83]87,91]). The others (in black in Table 4) used different algorithms of machine learning (Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, Convolutional Neuron Network, etc.)…”
Section: Handwriting Tools Based On the Processmentioning
confidence: 99%