2021
DOI: 10.1111/bph.15644
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity of cycloheximide chylomicron flow blocking method for the evaluation of lymphatic transport of drugs

Abstract: Background and purpose Lymphatic transport of drugs after oral administration is an important mechanism for absorption of highly lipophilic compounds. Direct measurement in lymph duct cannulated animals is the gold standard method, but non‐invasive cycloheximide chylomicron flow blocking method has gained popularity recently. However, concerns about its reliability have been raised. The aim of this work was to investigate the validity of cycloheximide chylomicron flow blocking method for the evaluation of lymp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ivacaftor lymphatic transport played only a minor role in the perspective of its general pharmacokinetics. The relative bioavailability via lymph (F RL ) of ∼5% for both the formulations is comparable to some other highly lipophilic compounds with ‘borderline’ lymphatic transport, such as abiraterone ( Rysanek et al, 2021 ), seocalcitol ( Grove et al, 2006 ), and ontazolast ( Hauss et al, 1998 ). The reason why the lymphatic transport was not significant (F RL > 10%) may lie in borderline ivacaftor lipophilicity, with the predicted log P of around 5.0.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The ivacaftor lymphatic transport played only a minor role in the perspective of its general pharmacokinetics. The relative bioavailability via lymph (F RL ) of ∼5% for both the formulations is comparable to some other highly lipophilic compounds with ‘borderline’ lymphatic transport, such as abiraterone ( Rysanek et al, 2021 ), seocalcitol ( Grove et al, 2006 ), and ontazolast ( Hauss et al, 1998 ). The reason why the lymphatic transport was not significant (F RL > 10%) may lie in borderline ivacaftor lipophilicity, with the predicted log P of around 5.0.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Lymphatic transport parameters were defined and calculated as previously described ( Rysanek et al, 2020 ; Rysanek et al, 2021 ; Jelinek et al, 2022 ; Salamunova et al, 2023 ). Briefly, absolute bioavailability via lymph (F AL ) was defined as the percentage of the administered drug dose absorbed into the lymph.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, Sun M et al blocked chylomicron blood flow by intrabitoneal injection of CYC to inhibit lymphatic transport in the self-microemulsifying drug delivery system [ 44 ]. CYC, a non-specific inhibitor of protein synthesis, inhibits chylomicron secretion from epithelial cells to the chylomicron by acting on microtubules [ 45 ]. As shown in Figure 2 , DMY-SEDDS demonstrated greater absorption compared to free DMY solution during intestinal perfusion, with both the absorption rate constant (Ka) and the apparent permeability (Papp) for DMY-SEDDS (Ka = 33.60, Papp = 3.30) higher than those of DMY solution (Ka = 28.82, Papp = 2.85).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lipophilic compounds may be absorbed across intestinal enterocytes directly into the lymphatics (Fig. 3c ; ➀) or may enter synthetic lipoprotein assembly pathways through binding affinity to the interfacial region of chylomicrons, very low-density lipoproteins (VLDLs), and high-density lipoproteins (HDLs) 38 41 . Following enterocyte exocytosis, drug–lipoprotein complexes are then transported across the basement membrane and traffic into lymphatics (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%