1977
DOI: 10.1037/0022-0167.24.6.487
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity of diverse procedures for reporting interest scores: An analysis of longitudinal data.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1980
1980
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prediger and his colleagues , Hanson et al 1977 continue to demonstrate that inventories with more versus less balanced items usually have similar concurrent and predictive validities. No direct tests of the infl uence of these versions have been performed.…”
Section: Inventory Effects and Controversymentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Prediger and his colleagues , Hanson et al 1977 continue to demonstrate that inventories with more versus less balanced items usually have similar concurrent and predictive validities. No direct tests of the infl uence of these versions have been performed.…”
Section: Inventory Effects and Controversymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In a similar 4-year longitudinal analysis, Hanson et al (1977), using the ACT Interest Inven tory, obtained hit rates of between 33% and 44% for another sample of 4419 college students. Related investigations by , O'Neil et al (1978a), , and Wiggins & Wes lander (1977) provide similar hit rates for other inventories.…”
Section: Forms Of Career Assistancementioning
confidence: 95%
“…It is well known that one needs to correct for restrictive socialization in inventories suggesting appropriate career direction by providing same-sex norms, lest the inventory unnecessarily perpetuate past discrimination (Hanson, Noeth, & Prediger, 1978). But the MBTI does not appear to have such safeguards.…”
Section: The Argument Against Using the Mbti In Counselingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interpretive booklet guides the respondent in converting the raw score to a normed referenced score. This is a most desirable feature because Hanson, Noeth, and Prediger (1977) pointed out the problems that may arise from using raw scores from inventories such as the Self-Directed Search (SDS) (Holland, 1985). (The SDS, of course, does not provide respondent tables for converting raw scores to norm referenced scores.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%