2006
DOI: 10.1214/105051605000000638
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity of heavy traffic steady-state approximations in generalized Jackson networks

Abstract: We consider a single class open queueing network, also known as a generalized Jackson network (GJN). A classical result in heavytraffic theory asserts that the sequence of normalized queue length processes of the GJN converge weakly to a reflected Brownian motion (RBM) in the orthant, as the traffic intensity approaches unity. However, barring simple instances, it is still not known whether the stationary distribution of RBM provides a valid approximation for the steady-state of the original network. In this p… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

8
249
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(257 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(71 reference statements)
8
249
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the deterministic version, and with arguments reminiscent of Lyapunov function tools used for stability proofs, we show that the system is in some sense attracted back into a certain domain. Finally, we remove the conditioning and apply some arguments from [5] to obtain the steady state bounds. Some of the arguments are common to several proofs.…”
Section: Performance Analysis For (S)-(c)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…For the deterministic version, and with arguments reminiscent of Lyapunov function tools used for stability proofs, we show that the system is in some sense attracted back into a certain domain. Finally, we remove the conditioning and apply some arguments from [5] to obtain the steady state bounds. Some of the arguments are common to several proofs.…”
Section: Performance Analysis For (S)-(c)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will then use Lemma 8 from §E and adapt the argument used in the proof of Theorem 5.1 in [5] to obtain a bound for the steady-state queue length process. The bound for the steady-state waiting time will then follow from an application of Little's law.…”
Section: Propositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations