2013
DOI: 10.3109/03014460.2013.769629
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity of newly-developed BMI and waist cut-off values for Sri Lankan children

Abstract: Internationally available BMI cut-off values are poor in diagnosing obesity in Sri Lankan children. Newly developed Sri Lankan BMI cut-off values for children improved the diagnosis. WC can be used successfully as an alternative diagnostic tool of obesity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
16
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…9,10 BMI cutoff values derived to estimate a fat mass (FM) of 32% and 25% in 5-to 18-year-old Sri Lankan girls and boys, respectively, 11 which are lower than prevailing international cutoff values, have shown high sensitivity and specificity. 12 The higher value of international anthropometric cutoff values, compared with the Sri Lankan cutoff, would underestimate overnutrition and overestimate undernutrition. This could also be the possible explanation for the long-stagnating undernutrition rates in Sri Lankan children.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,10 BMI cutoff values derived to estimate a fat mass (FM) of 32% and 25% in 5-to 18-year-old Sri Lankan girls and boys, respectively, 11 which are lower than prevailing international cutoff values, have shown high sensitivity and specificity. 12 The higher value of international anthropometric cutoff values, compared with the Sri Lankan cutoff, would underestimate overnutrition and overestimate undernutrition. This could also be the possible explanation for the long-stagnating undernutrition rates in Sri Lankan children.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prevalence of overweight and obesity were respectively 9.4% and 5.5% among teenage-girls in Batticaloa which in addition showed a 21.6% prevalence of central obesity [8]. Collectively, literature acknowledged that the prevalence of childhood obesity has been increasing over the time and shows a regional variation [6,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, the sensitivity of the currently adopted cutoff values of these measures is not similar, thus posing the question of the validity of a single cutoff value universally [3]. Furthermore, anthropometric measures have shown poor detection of MetD [4] and the current BMI cutoff has been less sensitive in detecting obesity as well as MetD in Sri Lankan children [3,4]. A major drawback of BMI is that it does not distinguish between Fat Mass (FM) and Fat Free Mass (FFM) nor does it show the pattern of fat distribution as central or peripheral, of which the latter is more associated with MetD [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%