2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41433-021-01463-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity of scoring systems for the assessment of technical and non-technical skills in ophthalmic surgery—a systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent systematic review of the literature found that there is currently no universally accepted standard competency assessment for open globe repair. 10 This assessment tool therefore fills a critical gap and serves three purposes: first, it will decrease subjectivity of the assessment OSCAR:OpenGlobe by defining for the assessor what behavior must be observed for each level of proficiency; second, the rubric clearly communicates to the learner what is expected to attain competence allowing self-directed learning; third, it provides a numerical system that allow for monitoring for improvement by the residency program director. Further, the grading sheet is simple and allows feedback in a timely fashion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A recent systematic review of the literature found that there is currently no universally accepted standard competency assessment for open globe repair. 10 This assessment tool therefore fills a critical gap and serves three purposes: first, it will decrease subjectivity of the assessment OSCAR:OpenGlobe by defining for the assessor what behavior must be observed for each level of proficiency; second, the rubric clearly communicates to the learner what is expected to attain competence allowing self-directed learning; third, it provides a numerical system that allow for monitoring for improvement by the residency program director. Further, the grading sheet is simple and allows feedback in a timely fashion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 8 , 9 However, no ICO-OSCAR nor another surgical competency rubric for open globe surgical management has been developed. 10 The development of OSCARs is now led by the Ophthalmology Foundation, which supports the continuation of this important initiative.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although flight simulators are more expensive than cataract surgery simulations, realistic cataract surgery simulation is arguably more challenging to achieve given the wide-ranging permutations of ocular, patient, environmental and staffing factors. Furthermore, aviation has formally incorporated NTS into training, simulation and assessment due to its strong associations with safety enhancement [2,9,10]. Pilots risk multiple fatalities (including their own) through severe NTS failures, whereas NTS failures do not threaten the cataract surgeon's vision when undertaking complicated surgery [2,7].…”
Section: Training and Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrary to traditional views that NTS were innate and therefore untrainable, studies have repeatedly shown that they can be taught, learned, assessed and refined through didactic teaching, e-learning and simulation [9]. Studies have also demonstrated strong correlations between a surgeon's NTS and TS abilities, however, there is a paucity of assessment tools focussed on NTS [10][11][12]. Furthermore, there remains little integration of NTS with training models and simulation in ophthalmic surgery [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%