2017
DOI: 10.21149/7860
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity of self-reported anthropometry in adult Mexican women

Abstract: Objective. To compare direct and self-reported anthropometry in Mexican women. Materials and methods. Women aged 30-72 years, participating in the Mexican Teachers' Cohort, completed a questionnaire with their anthropometric data in 2006-2008. After eleven months (median time), technicians performed anthropometry in 3 756 participants. We calculated correlations and multivariable-adjusted mean differences between direct and self-reported anthropometric measures. Results. Correlations between direct and self-re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
33
2
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
33
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A prior validation study in the MTC showed a correlation coefficient of 0.89 between current self‐reported and objectively measured weight. Sensitivity and specificity of self‐reported obesity were 66.5 and 97.0%, indicating that self‐reported anthropometry is valid for epidemiological purposes in adult Mexican women (Ortiz‐Panozo et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A prior validation study in the MTC showed a correlation coefficient of 0.89 between current self‐reported and objectively measured weight. Sensitivity and specificity of self‐reported obesity were 66.5 and 97.0%, indicating that self‐reported anthropometry is valid for epidemiological purposes in adult Mexican women (Ortiz‐Panozo et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weight change was defined as the difference between current weight and weight at 18 years of age. A prior validation study in the MTC showed a correlation coefficient of 0.89 between current self‐reported and objectively measured weight (Ortiz‐Panozo et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measured anthropometrics were highly correlated with self-reported anthropometrics in this population of Mexican women 16. BMI was calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in metres.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 90%