1994
DOI: 10.1016/0149-7189(94)90035-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity of self-reported drug use among injection drug users and crack cocaine users recruited through street outreach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
195
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 424 publications
(199 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
195
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We invested considerable efforts at developing a comparable interview protocol for the two cohorts, and previous studies of self-reports of street-recruited IDUs suggest that the self-reports are reasonably valid and reliable. 50,51 Nevertheless, the presence of selection, recall, or social desirability biases in the data cannot be ruled out. The mortality status of both cohorts was acquired from the same source, NDI, and we had several conversations with officials of the NDI to confirm that states followed similar reporting procedures and schedules.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We invested considerable efforts at developing a comparable interview protocol for the two cohorts, and previous studies of self-reports of street-recruited IDUs suggest that the self-reports are reasonably valid and reliable. 50,51 Nevertheless, the presence of selection, recall, or social desirability biases in the data cannot be ruled out. The mortality status of both cohorts was acquired from the same source, NDI, and we had several conversations with officials of the NDI to confirm that states followed similar reporting procedures and schedules.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 However, multicenter research on injection drug users has shown that self-report is very reliable among drug users not recruited in clinical settings. [28][29][30] Other studies 31,32 and our own [33][34][35] have found substantial operational and contextual differences among SEPs and the communities in which they operate. In California, there are potentially many important differences in both SEP characteristics and community context, and we continue to compile data that will permit in-depth analyses of these factors and HIV risk and secondary exchange.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the self-reported data may be affected by response bias including socially desirable responding. However, previous research has shown that reported behaviours by people who use drugs were generally truthful and reliable [47,48]. Third, although we restricted our sample to those residing the VPD jurisdiction, there is a possibility that some participants worked outside of the VPD jurisdiction where traditional law enforcement activities that targeted sex workers were taking place.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%