2015
DOI: 10.1161/strokeaha.114.008046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity of Shape as a Predictive Biomarker of Final Infarct Volume in Acute Ischemic Stroke

Abstract: 2=0.98 in model with volume and shape). Conclusions-Our findings suggest that lesion shape contains important predictive information and reflects important environmental factors that might determine the progression of ischemia from the core. (Stroke. 2015;46:976-981.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to simulate shape variability, we need to use shape models representative of the shape variability observed on clinical data. We studied the european I‐KNOW database and constructed, from real patient images, four shape models ( R1, R2, R3, and R4) with ischemic lesion shapes and tissue distributions representative of the variability observed in the database (see Fig. ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to simulate shape variability, we need to use shape models representative of the shape variability observed on clinical data. We studied the european I‐KNOW database and constructed, from real patient images, four shape models ( R1, R2, R3, and R4) with ischemic lesion shapes and tissue distributions representative of the variability observed in the database (see Fig. ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large inter-patient variability remains, and direct integration of clinical variables was not found relevant. A better use of clinical information, more advanced filtering methods (Forkert et al, 2013) and additional MRI contrast parameters (Mouridsen, Hansen, Østergaard, & Jespersen, 2014) or spatial descriptors (Frindel et al, 2015) may improve the accuracy of our predictive model. However, unexpected sources of inaccuracy due to spontaneous reperfusion or lesion atrophy may persist.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Automatic quantification of these features extracts information from imaging data that is not accessible by qualitative visual rating [16][17][18][19]. Analysis of three-dimensional stroke lesion morphology has been used to characterize disease progression in small vessel disease [17] or lesion development in acute ischemic stroke [12]. However, to our knowledge, we provide the first study of lesion morphology as potential indicator of stroke etiology.…”
Section: Cardioembolic Stroke (Ascod C1 C2)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stroke lesions involving multiple vascular territories would, therefore, result in large bounding box volumes. In addition, multiple, small and scattered lesions would lead to a very high ratio between the volume of the minimum oriented bounding box and lesion volume, whereas this ratio would be smaller for a single lesion of identical volume as illustrated in Fig 2. The ratio between bounding box and lesion volume also quantifies the more or less holey structure of a lesion and has previously been shown to be of value in a model predicting final infarct volumes [12]. In our group of patients, 11 of 37 patients with a potential cardioembolic etiology displayed lesions located in at least two of the main arterial territories of the brain (left or right internal carotid artery or posterior circulation territory), whereas this pattern was only found in 6 of 54 non-cardioembolic stroke patients.…”
Section: Cardioembolic Stroke (Ascod C1 C2)mentioning
confidence: 99%