1965
DOI: 10.1037/h0020580
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity of socioeconomic origin as a predictor of executive success.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1968
1968
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the many studies in the last century that have focused on predictors of successful job performance for specific jobs or organizations (see Ployhart, Schmitt, & Tippins, 2017 ) , significant progress has been made in understanding how and what types of individuals achieve career success more generally. Reflecting the idea that career success is manifested in different ways, researchers have operationalized career success with a broad set of objective (i.e., earnings, occupational prestige, educational attainment, budget responsibilities) and subjective measures (i.e., job satisfaction, life satisfaction, and career satisfaction) (e.g., Childs & Klimoski, 1986 ; Judge & Kammeyer-Mueller, 2012 ; Porter, 1965 ; Wakabayashi, Graen, Graen, & Graen, 1988 ; Wolff & Moser, 2009) .…”
Section: Key Research Questions and Influential Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the many studies in the last century that have focused on predictors of successful job performance for specific jobs or organizations (see Ployhart, Schmitt, & Tippins, 2017 ) , significant progress has been made in understanding how and what types of individuals achieve career success more generally. Reflecting the idea that career success is manifested in different ways, researchers have operationalized career success with a broad set of objective (i.e., earnings, occupational prestige, educational attainment, budget responsibilities) and subjective measures (i.e., job satisfaction, life satisfaction, and career satisfaction) (e.g., Childs & Klimoski, 1986 ; Judge & Kammeyer-Mueller, 2012 ; Porter, 1965 ; Wakabayashi, Graen, Graen, & Graen, 1988 ; Wolff & Moser, 2009) .…”
Section: Key Research Questions and Influential Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Bernile, Bhagwat, and Rau (2017) argued and found that CEOs who had been exposed to moderate fatalities as a result of a natural disaster were likely to be more risk-seeking compared with those who had not had such exposure. In one of the early works on the topic of background, Porter (1965) examined socioeconomic origin and found positive relationships with indicators of executive career success. Stern and Westphal (2010) found that subtle forms of flattery and opinion conformity were successful tactics for directors aiming at obtaining board seats and that those with a background in politics, law, or sales or an upper-class background were more successful at engaging in such behaviors.…”
Section: Experiences and Background Beyond The Work Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During previous efforts to define leadership, the social and psychological characteristics of leaders were investigated. The results of the studies dealing with social backgrounds of individuals indicated that the leaders were from higher socioeconomic statuses (Porter, 1965) and had higher levels of intelligence (Pickle and Friedlander, 1967) and scholarship (Garrison, 1933) than nonleaders. Leaders were also found to score higher than nonleaders on measures of personal characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%