1988
DOI: 10.1093/ije/17.1.217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity of the 24-Hour Recall Method in Infancy: The Leiden Pre-School Children Study

Abstract: In the Leiden Pre-School Children Study the 24-hour recall method was used to determine the energy and nutrient intake of children from four to 28 months. A validation study was carried out in order to get insight into the validity of the collected dietary data. In the first part of the study the validity of the Dutch food table, supplemented with data on commercial babyfoods, was tested. The calculated average energy and nutrient intake of 111 six-month-old non-breastfed infants was compared with the results … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although such differences might result from differences between the food composition values used in the preparation of the food composition table and those in this survey, we think that the differences could be greatly attributed to mineral loss due to cooking. As Horst et al (24) indicated that a difference in weights between the 24-h recall method and the duplicate-portion technique is one of the factors of the systematic difference between both methods, the differences in the mineral intakes between our study and the NHNS were thought to result from errors in the calculated values.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Although such differences might result from differences between the food composition values used in the preparation of the food composition table and those in this survey, we think that the differences could be greatly attributed to mineral loss due to cooking. As Horst et al (24) indicated that a difference in weights between the 24-h recall method and the duplicate-portion technique is one of the factors of the systematic difference between both methods, the differences in the mineral intakes between our study and the NHNS were thought to result from errors in the calculated values.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Fat and vitamin C intake were also overestimated by 3 and 6%, respectively, although these differences did not reach signi®cance (Harbottle & Duggan, 1993). The Leiden Pre-School Children Study (Horst et al, 1988) also demonstrated systematic bias, albeit small at less than 5%, between methods when comparing 24 h recall with duplicate food portions. Energy and nutrient intake of Dutch children aged 4 ± 28 months was overestimated by the recall method.…”
Section: Validation Of Food Diary Methods For Dietary Assessment Ja Lamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wealth index, which is an asset-based scale from 0 to 63, was adapted from the third National Family Health Study (19) and incorporated into the questionnaire. Children's nutrient intakes from complementary foods was estimated by using a 24-h dietary recall and calculated on the basis of a locally validated database of common local foods (20,21). Whether children were still receiving any breast milk was also evaluated.…”
Section: Questionnairementioning
confidence: 99%