2017
DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.423
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity of the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer and Hong Kong Liver Cancer staging systems for hepatocellular carcinoma in Singapore

Abstract: In our patient population, the HKLC system is comparable to the BCLC system in prognosticating patients, but is suggested to have better performance in guiding treatment.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This effectively increases the pool of HCC patients being considered for curative treatment under HKLC staging, who would otherwise not receive such an assignment by the BCLC algorithm. These findings are similar to a recent study conducted in a separate Singapore center, where 57.3% (439/766) of patients were classified by HKLC into stages I, II and Va, while only 38.5% (295/766) were classified by BCLC into stages 0 and A[14]. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This effectively increases the pool of HCC patients being considered for curative treatment under HKLC staging, who would otherwise not receive such an assignment by the BCLC algorithm. These findings are similar to a recent study conducted in a separate Singapore center, where 57.3% (439/766) of patients were classified by HKLC into stages I, II and Va, while only 38.5% (295/766) were classified by BCLC into stages 0 and A[14]. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Moreover, it was also not possible to tell if other co-morbidities precluded certain curative treatment options, for example a patient with significant pulmonary hypertension or valvular heart disease would be a high risk candidate for surgery but still have a good ECOG and Child-Pugh status at the time of diagnosis of HCC. This was also the conclusion in the study by Selby et al[14], where nearly half of the patients did not follow treatment recommendations by either staging system due to patients’ personal and physicians’ professional decision. Secondly, therapies have evolved and so have the techniques and experience of physicians, surgeons and interventional radiologists over the three decades of our HCC registry.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Medical institutions should select a more suitable staging system for their HCC patients. 29 Except for FLR being an independent predictor of survival prognosis in HCC, some previous studies have found that larger tumor size (greater than 5 cm), higher TNM stage (stage III−Ⅳ), and microvascular invasion are all independent predictors for poor prognosis of HCC. In this study, these results have been verified again.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Length of stay was calculated from the date of surgery to date of discharge, inclusive of both dates. Upon discharge, patients were followed with physical examination, liver function test, AFP, and multiphasic CT scan according to local protocol [17]. Site of recurrence was determined from clinical records and imaging.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All patients for liver resection received calf compressor devices, Bair hugger, low central venous pressure anesthesia, surgical infection prophylaxis, and intraoperative glycaemia monitoring according to our institutional policy [17, 18]. For open liver resections, a reverse “L” incision was made.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%