1999
DOI: 10.1039/a807917j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity of the weighted HOMO–LUMO energy separation as an index of kinetic stability for fullerenes with up to 120 carbon atoms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
60
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The energy gap between the HOMO and LUMO levels is 1.70 eV, 0.03 eV enlarged compared with 1.67 eV of C 60 . From this point of view, N 4 @C 60 seem to be more kinetically stable than C 60 [6,28] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The energy gap between the HOMO and LUMO levels is 1.70 eV, 0.03 eV enlarged compared with 1.67 eV of C 60 . From this point of view, N 4 @C 60 seem to be more kinetically stable than C 60 [6,28] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Aihara et al previously reported that T value, i.e., the E g separation multiplied by the number of constituting atoms, is preferred as an index of kinetic stability (we mean stability against all possible chemical reactions and decomposition) of fullerene isomers [36]. They showed that fullerenes with a large T value have large minimum bond resonance energy [37].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In addition, the more significantly the energy gap between the frontier orbitals gets, the more stable the molecular structures are. [43][44][45] As shown in Figure 5, LUMO of 1 are made of π orbitals coming from thiazole ring and p hybrid orbitals of O atoms in the CF 3 SO 3 -anion, similarly, HOMO of 1 are also made of π and sp orbitals from thiazole ring and CF 3 SO 3 -anion, but the electron density distributions are different. The electron density of the thiazole ring is smaller than that of O atoms from the CF 3 SO 3 -anion as drawn in HOMO, whereas the case of LUMO in Figure 5b is opposite.…”
Section: Quantum Mechanical Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 97%