2008
DOI: 10.1002/art.23564
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity, reliability, and feasibility of durometer measurements of scleroderma skin disease in a multicenter treatment trial

Abstract: Objective. To determine the validity, reliability, and feasibility of durometer measurements of skin hardness as an outcome measure in clinical trials of scleroderma. Methods. Skin hardness was measured during a multicenter treatment trial for scleroderma using handheld digital durometers with a continuous scale. Skin thickness was measured by modified Rodnan skin score (MRSS). Other outcome data collected included the Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire. In a reliability exercise in advance of the tri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
70
1
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
6
70
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, Kissin et al demonstrated that durometry enables detection of even minor changes in skin hardness over time [24]. For our investigations we used a new durometer and observed – in line with previous studies – that durometry is painless and can be easily performed [23,24,25]. Durometry was suitable for the documentation of the success of therapy and to motivate patients to continue treatments.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, Kissin et al demonstrated that durometry enables detection of even minor changes in skin hardness over time [24]. For our investigations we used a new durometer and observed – in line with previous studies – that durometry is painless and can be easily performed [23,24,25]. Durometry was suitable for the documentation of the success of therapy and to motivate patients to continue treatments.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…In earlier investigations durometry has been proven to be reliable in the assessment of morphea [23,24,25]. Moreover, Kissin et al demonstrated that durometry enables detection of even minor changes in skin hardness over time [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding their hardness, the human skin data reported in the literature [6][7][8]25] has quite a wide range (0-65DU), which is mainly due to the large number of various sites tested. All the tested silicone materials lie within this range, however one must keep in mind that there is a lack of scalp hardness values reported in the current literature that has yet to be investigated.…”
Section: Failure Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it is an anisotropic (force response is dependent on the force direction) and a nonlinear material [1][2][3]. Several studies have identified that human skin's mechanical behavior is dependent on a variety of factors, such as age, gender, health and weight of the donor, as well as the location of the site and its orientation [1,2,[4][5][6][7][8]. The use of human skin in test situations may potentially make it difficult to analyze any experimental results and repeating of the experiment would be problematic [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bislang wurde allerdings nur das Durometer, das das Ausmaß der Hautverhärtung misst, in klinischen Studien validiert [28]. Um diese Hypothese zu untermauern, bedarf es der Anwendung von TNF-α-Blockern in entzündungsunabhängigen Tiermodellen der SSc [29].…”
Section: Hautfibroseunclassified