Validity, reliability, and transcultural adaptations of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (BSID-III-NL) for children in Suriname

McLester-Davis, Lauren W.Y.; Shankar, Arti; Kataria, Leila; Hidalgo, A.G.; Eer, Edward D van; Koendjbiharie, Aloysius Ph.; Ramjatan, Radha; Hatch, Virginia; Middleton, Melissa; Zijlmans, Wilco; Lichtveld, Maureen Y.; Drury, Stacy S.

doi:10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2021.105416

Cited by 10 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Most scales across all ages have been shown to be reliable (≥0.7). In children of older age groups, the indicators of internal consistency were slightly higher (≥0.8), which is consistent with the results of international studies (McHenry et al, 2021;McLester-Davis et al, 2021). Relatively low reliability coefficients were recorded on the communicative scale at 10 months (<0.7).…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 88%

“…Most often, they included healthy children, but also, depending on scientific goals, children with clinical diagnoses could participate. In most cases, after appropriate translation considering local cultural, historical, and social features, the instrument showed to be valid and reliable in different cultures (Sun et al, 2019;McLester-Davis et al, 2021;Salah El-Din et al, 2021). Some non-US studies demonstrated successful application of the Bayley-III using the original norms even without prior sociocultural adaptation (Yu et al, 2013;Ballot et al, 2017).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A psychometric study of the Russian-language version of the “Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development–third edition”: An assessment of reliability and validity

Pavlova

Maksimov²,

Chegodaev³

et al. 2022

Front. Psychol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionThe Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development–third edition (Bayley-III) is one of the most widely used tools for assessing child development, and adapted versions of this instrument have been successfully used in many countries. No comprehensive psychometric studies of the Bayley-III have yet been performed in Russia.Materials and methodsThis psychometric study was part of the longitudinal study conducted by the Ural Federal University in 2016–2020. Within the project, the original Bayley-III manual was translated into Russian and then used in a cohort of 333 infants to assess cognition, expressive/receptive communication, and fine/gross motor skills. For the purpose of psychometric analysis, we selected the data for four age groups of children from the longitudinal study database: 4–6 months (N = 149), 10 months (N = 138), 15 months (N = 151), and 24 months (N = 124). The development scores of the sample children were compared with the original Bayley-III norms in each age strata separately. Reliability and validity of the translated instrument were examined using correlation analysis, tests of internal consistency, and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).ResultsThe average scaled scores of the examined children were generally comparable with the original (US) Bayley-III norms, with the exception of those older than 1 year, who demonstrated 1.2–1.9 points better performance in cognitive development and gross motor skills and 0.9–2.6 points lower performance in expressive communication. The correlation of both raw and scaled scores between different scales was low to moderate in all age groups (Spearman’s ρ mostly within the range of 0.3–0.6; p < 0.001 for all pairwise correlations). Internal consistency tests confirmed high reliability of the translated instrument (Cronbach’s α = 0.74–0.87, McDonald’s ω = 0.79–0.89). CFA demonstrated a good fit of the three-factor model (cognitive, communicative, and motor components) in all age strata.ConclusionThe Russian version of the Bayley-III proved to be a psychometrically valid and reliable tool for assessing child development, at least in a research context. The development of the examined children was close to the original US norms, with some deviation in cognitive, gross motor, and expressive communication scores mostly in older children, which could be attributed to the biased sample.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 88%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A psychometric study of the Russian-language version of the “Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development–third edition”: An assessment of reliability and validity

Pavlova

Maksimov²,

Chegodaev³

et al. 2022

Front. Psychol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…9,11,12 The BSID-III is considered the gold standard for developmental assessments in early childhood and has been validated in many languages including English and Spanish. 9,12,13 Parents of the toddlers choose the preferred language for their child's BSID-III assessment, which for this study, was Spanish or English. The assessment was administered by certified examiners and if needed, interpreters, and lasted between one and one and a half hours.…”

Section: Selection and Description Of Participantsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Data collected at the 18-24-month corrected age visit included: vision impairment, blindness, use of corrective lenses, permanent hearing loss, use of cochlear implant/hearing aids, Early Intervention (EI), occupational therapy, physical therapy, speech therapy, daycare, weight, length, head circumference, BSID-III scores and neurological assessment. 4,12,13…”

Section: Key Notesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A limitation of this study is that the BSID-III was originally developed for English speakers. 9,13 However, the clinic protocol at our site is that parents are always asked which language they wish the examiners to use during BSID administration. The authors also acknowledge that language scores are more subject to impact than motor scores by the interpreter or examiner's Spanish language skills.…”

Section: Ta B L E 1 Maternal Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Language outcomes at 18–24 months of preterm infants from US Spanish‐ and English‐speaking homes

Feragne,

Tucker,

Mayne

et al. 2023

Acta Paediatrica

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

AimTo evaluate the association of Spanish compared to English primary household language on preterm (PT) infants' language outcomes in the United States and to examine associations with socio‐economic factors.MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort of PT infants born <32 weeks gestation from Spanish‐speaking (n = 95) and English‐speaking homes (n = 1030) born 2005–2019. Language (primary outcome) and cognitive and motor skills (secondary outcomes) were measured using the BSID‐III at 18–24 months corrected age. Group differences were evaluated using bivariate comparisons and logistic regression analyses.ResultsMothers reporting Spanish‐speaking homes had higher rates of public insurance and lower educational achievement. Group newborn characteristics were similar. Preterm infants from Spanish‐speaking homes had significantly lower BSID‐III language composite, cognitive composite, receptive and expressive scores compared to infants from English‐speaking homes. Logistic regression modelling identified independent negative effects of Spanish‐speaking household OR 3.26 (CI 1.89–5.62) and public insurance OR 2.31 (CI 1.71–3.12) with a protective benefit derived from breast milk OR 0.68 (CI 0.50–0.92) when adjusting for medical morbidities, socio‐economic factors and gestational age.ConclusionPublic health policies and interventions in the United States should target language and cognitive outcomes of PT infants from Spanish‐speaking homes.

show abstract

Entrepreneurship in Suriname

Salamzadeh

Романович

2022

Springer Texts in Business and Economics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Validity, reliability, and transcultural adaptations of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (BSID-III-NL) for children in Suriname

Cited by 10 publications

References 12 publications

A psychometric study of the Russian-language version of the “Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development–third edition”: An assessment of reliability and validity

A psychometric study of the Russian-language version of the “Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development–third edition”: An assessment of reliability and validity

Language outcomes at 18–24 months of preterm infants from US Spanish‐ and English‐speaking homes

Entrepreneurship in Suriname

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About