2019
DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1573934
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity, responsiveness, and perceptions of clinical utility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure when used in a sub-acute setting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, this is the first study dealing with actual COPM use and this realistic result may be useful for clinical use of the COPM. Some previous exploratory qualitative studies have yielded many factors affecting the routine use of the COPM (Colquhoun et al, 2010;Gustafsson et al, 2010;Roe et al, 2019). In the current quantitative study, the COPM proportion and FIM cognitive items were identified as the factors most affecting the routine use/non-use of the COPM.…”
Section: Demographic Datamentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, this is the first study dealing with actual COPM use and this realistic result may be useful for clinical use of the COPM. Some previous exploratory qualitative studies have yielded many factors affecting the routine use of the COPM (Colquhoun et al, 2010;Gustafsson et al, 2010;Roe et al, 2019). In the current quantitative study, the COPM proportion and FIM cognitive items were identified as the factors most affecting the routine use/non-use of the COPM.…”
Section: Demographic Datamentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Previous research demonstrated that COPM non-use was associated with clients' significant cognitive impairment, language impairment, and poor health, based on qualitative interviews with older adults and occupational therapists in the subacute setting (Roe et al, 2019). Other studies in the subacute setting using qualitative methods found that time constraints were barriers to the use of the COPM (Colquhoun et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introduction and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the ability to document change is an important part of the COPM, the small number of studies which have measured these changes is surprising. Four studies demonstrated adequate results regarding the measurement's responsiveness, that is, ability to demonstrate change (Eyssen et al 2011;Tuntland et al, 2016;Roe et al 2019;Wressle et al 1999), while in the study of Nieuwenhuizen et al, they did not find adequate responsiveness (Nieuwenhuizen et al, 2014). Given that there is no gold standard related to the scores of the COPM, we examined the responsiveness with external criterions, that is, measurements examining a construct like the construct of the COPM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The questionnaire also captured participants' satisfaction with their performance at each stage of testing, measured on a 1-10 scale with 1 being the lowest rating and 10 the highest. The COPM is considered a reliable and validated performance measurement tool for clinicians working with individuals with various disabilities (Lalor et al, 2019;Roe et al, 2019;Thyer et al, 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%