2008
DOI: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v23i0.2648
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Valor nutricional da casca do grão de soja, farelo de soja, milho moído e farelo de trigo para bovinos

Abstract: RESUMO.Foi realizada análise bromatológica da casca do grão de soja (CGS), farelo de soja, milho moído e farelo de trigo; ensaio de digestibilidade in vitro da matéria seca (DIVMS) e da parede celular (DIVPC) dos referidos alimentos; e degradabilidade in situ da matéria seca (MS), matéria orgânica (MO) e energia bruta (EB), da CGS moída (CSM) ou peletizada (CSP). Para a determinação da DIVMS e DIVPC, foram realizadas três coletas de líquido ruminal, com intervalos de uma semana. Para a determinação da degradab… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
24
3
40

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
7
24
3
40
Order By: Relevance
“…The chemical composition of soybean meal had only the contents of CP and MM changing depending on the seasons (Table 3). Despite variations, the obtained values are similar to those found by Rieger et al (2008), who studied the composition of soybean meals of the West and Southwest regions of Paraná, and Zambom et al (2001), who studied the nutritional value of feed for ruminants in the North West of Paraná. The CP, however, showed variations depending on the seasons, but these variations are not due specifically to climatic conditions, but rather to the origin of the grains used for bran production (Grieshop et al, 2003) and the shell proportion added to the bran (Zambom et al, 2001).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The chemical composition of soybean meal had only the contents of CP and MM changing depending on the seasons (Table 3). Despite variations, the obtained values are similar to those found by Rieger et al (2008), who studied the composition of soybean meals of the West and Southwest regions of Paraná, and Zambom et al (2001), who studied the nutritional value of feed for ruminants in the North West of Paraná. The CP, however, showed variations depending on the seasons, but these variations are not due specifically to climatic conditions, but rather to the origin of the grains used for bran production (Grieshop et al, 2003) and the shell proportion added to the bran (Zambom et al, 2001).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The Tifton 85 bermudagrass plus soybean hulls had higher dry matter 347.43 g kg -1 (P <0.05) compared to the other treatments (Table 1), and all treatments were within the appropriate range to allow a proper fermentation and prevent undesired fermentation which occurs in fodder silages with DM levels below 250.0 g kg -1 compromising the nutritional value of the silage. The highest values of dry matter in silage plus soybean hulls is due to high water retention of this additive being considered by Zambom et al (2001) a good absorbent additive.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soybean hulls is obtained before crushing, because before this process is necessary to extract the film that covers the grain, thus generating this co-product of this industry which according to Zambom et al, (2001) presents high adsorption power.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increases of IVDDM found when adding the byproducts to the sugar cane silage with addition of L. buchneri are due to the nutritional value of the soybean hull -with the low level of lignin and NDF of high ruminal digestibility (Zambom et al, 2001) -and cassava byproduct meal -with high level of starch and low levels of NDF and ADF (Zeoula & Caldas Neto, 2001). Moreover, the increase of the levels of DM combined with the effect of L. buchneri reduced the losses of soluble carbohydrate during the fermentation process, which may have taken a higher speed acidification, fastest pH fall, with consequent redutions in losses and the low concentration of lignin found in these treatments (44; 47 vs. 67 g/kg) may explain such results.…”
Section: Results An Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%