2023
DOI: 10.3390/en16196796
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Valorisation of Waste Heat in Existing and Future District Heating Systems

Ieva Pakere,
Dagnija Blumberga,
Anna Volkova
et al.

Abstract: To recover thermal energy from different sources, its quality and possibilities for utilisation are essential. The wide range of engineering solutions includes a direct connection to the district heating (DH) system and the integration of low-quality heat using heat pumps to increase the temperature level of recoverable heat. Therefore, this article compares waste heat valorisation strategies for integration into existing DH networks, low-temperature DH, and ultra-low heat supply systems using the multi-criter… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 63 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• Group 1: retrofits of existing processes can be problematic (e.g., due to insufficient space) [20], while some technologies require specific conditions to work properly [21]; • Group 2: the selection of the best technology may not be straightforward [22], and corrosion, erosion, and fouling of the heat transfer surfaces can severely limit the prospective operator's options [23]; • Group 3: the environmental impact of the working fluids [24] and their degradation at higher temperatures [25] may prove to be problematic, higher exergy losses [26] and low conversion efficiencies of conventional thermoelectric materials [27] have often been reported, and some technologies are still under development and are largely unproven (thus risky and unattractive to, e.g., shareholders); • Group 4: the seasonal nature of the demand [28] as well as the greater distances between the heat source and sink [29] are often major challenges, and some technologies have also been shown to suffer from low efficiency [30]; • All groups: long(er) payback periods may discourage the investors [31].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Group 1: retrofits of existing processes can be problematic (e.g., due to insufficient space) [20], while some technologies require specific conditions to work properly [21]; • Group 2: the selection of the best technology may not be straightforward [22], and corrosion, erosion, and fouling of the heat transfer surfaces can severely limit the prospective operator's options [23]; • Group 3: the environmental impact of the working fluids [24] and their degradation at higher temperatures [25] may prove to be problematic, higher exergy losses [26] and low conversion efficiencies of conventional thermoelectric materials [27] have often been reported, and some technologies are still under development and are largely unproven (thus risky and unattractive to, e.g., shareholders); • Group 4: the seasonal nature of the demand [28] as well as the greater distances between the heat source and sink [29] are often major challenges, and some technologies have also been shown to suffer from low efficiency [30]; • All groups: long(er) payback periods may discourage the investors [31].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%