2017
DOI: 10.1186/s13068-017-0780-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Valorization of untreated rice bran towards bioflocculant using a lignocellulose-degrading strain and its use in microalgal biomass harvest

Abstract: BackgroundMicroalgae are currently considered as a promising feedstock for the production of biofuels and high-value products. However, the efficient harvest of microalgal biomasses from their culture broth is a major challenge. The harvesting of algal biomass by flocculation combined with gravity sedimentation is more convenient and cost-effective than traditional methods such as centrifugation and filtration. Compared to inorganic and chemically synthetic flocculants, bioflocculants are a suitable choice for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 a). The xylanase activity of G22 was the highest of four tested bioflocculant-producing bacteria, the latter of which, showed maximum xylanase activities of 0.46 U mL −1 ( C. cellulans L804) [ 26 ], 1.69 U mL −1 ( B. agaradhaerens C9) [ 27 ], and 1.03 U mL −1 ( Pseudomonas sp. GO2) [ 21 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1 a). The xylanase activity of G22 was the highest of four tested bioflocculant-producing bacteria, the latter of which, showed maximum xylanase activities of 0.46 U mL −1 ( C. cellulans L804) [ 26 ], 1.69 U mL −1 ( B. agaradhaerens C9) [ 27 ], and 1.03 U mL −1 ( Pseudomonas sp. GO2) [ 21 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bioflocculant yields of G22 were comparable to that of most other bioflocculant-producing strains, which produced bioflocculant yields of 0.205–2.93 g L −1 [ 50 , 51 ]. However, these yields were lower than that of some high-producing strains, such as C. cellulans L804 (4.75 g L −1 ) [ 26 ], and B. agaradhaerens C9 (12.94 g L −1 ) [ 27 ]. The decrease in flocculating efficiency is most likely due to the secretion of bioflocculant-degrading enzymes via the bacteria and cell autolysis [ 24 , 52 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Flocculants can be of chemical and biological origins where the latter is referred to as natural macromolecule polymers or bio-flocculants produced by microorganisms that are capable of flocculating a number of suspended solids, including cells and colloidal solids, while being harmless and biodegradable (Chen et al, 2017). These bio-flocculants have been widely reported and applied to wastewater treatment, heavy metal removal and sludge dewatering and in the harvest of various microalgae (Ndikubwimana et al, 2016;Liu et al, 2017). However, the high cost of production of bio-flocculants still hinders their application commercially.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the high cost of production of bio-flocculants still hinders their application commercially. It has been proposed that costs of production can be reduced by either screening for high production strains or utilization of low-cost substrates as culture medium (Chen et al, 2016;Liu et al, 2017). A number of novel bio-flocculantproducing bacteria have been reported to be isolated from various environments such as wastewaters, activated sludges and soil samples, and they have been used to produce high yields of bioflocculants by optimizing their conditions of fermentation (Peng et al, 2014;Liu et al, 2015b) but little effort has been vested in the use of indigenous open water as a potential source of bio-flocculating bacteria that could possess better flocculating activity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%