2006
DOI: 10.1002/fut.20219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Valuation and optimal strategies of convertible bonds

Abstract: This article presents a contingent claim valuation of a callable convertible bond with the issuer's credit risk. The optimal call, voluntary conversion, and bankruptcy strategies are jointly determined by shareholders and bondholders to maximize the equity value and the bond value, respectively. This model not only incorporates tax benefits, bankruptcy costs, refunding costs, and a call notice period, but also takes account of the issuer's debt size and structure. The numerical results show that the predicted … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Brennan and Schwartz (1977) consider more generalized contingent claims models of convertibles and present finite difference solution of the pricing models. Liao and Huang (2006) present enhanced versions of the firm value contingent claims models with the incorporation of various structural features, like tax benefits, bankruptcy costs, refunding costs, call notice period, etc. In the first generation of contingent claims models, the firm value process is used as the stochastic fundamental and the corporate structure of the issuer firm is assumed to have senior straight debt, convertible bond and equity.…”
Section: Structural Firm Value Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brennan and Schwartz (1977) consider more generalized contingent claims models of convertibles and present finite difference solution of the pricing models. Liao and Huang (2006) present enhanced versions of the firm value contingent claims models with the incorporation of various structural features, like tax benefits, bankruptcy costs, refunding costs, call notice period, etc. In the first generation of contingent claims models, the firm value process is used as the stochastic fundamental and the corporate structure of the issuer firm is assumed to have senior straight debt, convertible bond and equity.…”
Section: Structural Firm Value Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A detailed review of convertible bond financing can be found in Dutordoir et al (2014). 4 The structural credit-risk model is widely adopted for pricing convertible bonds, such as Sîrbu and Shreve (2006), Liao and Huang (2006), and N. Chen et al (2013), to name a few. Though pricing convertibles with default risk can also be handled via Jarrow and Turnbull's (1995) reducedform credit-risk model, such as Chambers and Lu (2007) and Wang and Dai (2017), adopting structural models facilitates the analyses of option exercise policies in terms of the bond issuer's asset value and interest rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, a typical minimum call notice period in a callable convertible bond is 30 days, and the maximum length of this period reaches 92 days in King and Mauer's (2014) sample. Liao and Huang (2006) incorporate this feature into their CVCD evaluation framework.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liao and Huang [3] considered the pricing of convertible bond with credit risk under the geometric Brownian motion model. Zhou and Wang [4] assumed that the interest rate follows the geometric Brownian motion and obtained the valuation of convertible bond by the method of measure transformation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%