2017
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2978730
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Valuation Implications of FAS 159 Reported Gains and Losses from Fair Value Accounting for Liabilities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to the above results, Chung et al. (2017b) and Cedergren, Chen, and Chen (2019) find some evidence in support of measuring liabilities at fair value by demonstrating that changes in the value of US financial firms’ liabilities measured at fair value are generally value relevant to investors. Regardless, neither of these studies considers whether and how investors or analysts view assets measured at fair value differently than liabilities measured at fair value.…”
Section: Usefulness Of Fair Value Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast to the above results, Chung et al. (2017b) and Cedergren, Chen, and Chen (2019) find some evidence in support of measuring liabilities at fair value by demonstrating that changes in the value of US financial firms’ liabilities measured at fair value are generally value relevant to investors. Regardless, neither of these studies considers whether and how investors or analysts view assets measured at fair value differently than liabilities measured at fair value.…”
Section: Usefulness Of Fair Value Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…In a sample of US financial firms, Chung et al. (2017b) investigate the value relevance of DVAs and find a positive relationship between DVAs and stock returns, while Cedergren et al. (2019) find insignificant results in their sample of 47 US BHCs.…”
Section: Usefulness Of Fair Value Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that investors price the wealth transfer from debtholders to shareholders that DVAs represent correctly when firms do not recognize DVAs. Chung et al (2017) find that investors potentially misprice DVAs but perceive them as value-relevant. Cedergren et al (2015) add to the latter finding by showing that investors also understand the offsetting relation between DVAs and corresponding changes in unrecognized intangible assets.…”
Section: Prior Literaturementioning
confidence: 96%
“…At the same time, recent empirical studies do not find that DVAs' perceived ''counterintuitiveness'' results in adverse capital market effects. Instead, the evidence suggests that investors perceive DVAs as value-relevant (Chung et al 2017), that investors understand the relation between DVAs and incomplete fair value accounting (Cedergren et al 2015), and that DVAs do not increase information asymmetry between investors (Schneider and Tran 2015;Fontes et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation