2019
DOI: 10.1142/s2382624x19500073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Valuation of Access to Irrigation Water in Rural Ethiopia: Application of Choice Experiment and Contingent Valuation Methods

Abstract: Smallholder farmers in Africa rely heavily on rainfed agriculture. Those who have access to irrigation often receive it at no charge, but quantity, frequency and reliability may be limited without adequate revenue for maintenance and operation. Moreover, the absence of fees means that there are no pricing signals to encourage conservation of this scarce resource. In a situation where farmers do not pay for irrigation water use, this study investigates demand-side issues by eliciting farmers’ willingness to pay… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The other part εij is a stochastic element representing unobservable factors that affect the respondent's decisions in choosing different management scenarios (Rolfe et al, 2004). Therefore, the probability that the individual i chooses alternative j over all other alternatives given in the choice set S can be stated as (Mekonnen et al, 2019; Goibov et al, 2012) Pijgoodbreak=pr0.25em()Uij>Uik0.25emfor0.25emall0.25emnormalJnormalS0.25emnormalJnormalk Substituting the Equation in , we get italicPigoodbreak=Prtrue(V(),XijSigoodbreak+italicεij>Pr()V(),XikSigoodbreak+italicϵikitalicfor0.25emitalicall0.25emJS,Jk The above dissemination of the error term suggests that the probability of any specific alternative j being chosen as the most preferred one is expressed in logistic distribution (McFadden, 1973) expressed in the following equation number (). This specified equation is known as the conditional model expressed as (Hanley et al, 2001) P(),italicUij>italicUikitalicfor0.25emitalicall0.25emjkgoodbreak=exp()μVijexp()μVij where μ is the scale parameter, inversely proportional to the standard deviation of error term V()eijπ26σ2 where σ0.25em is the standard deviation of the error distribution (Ben‐Akiva & Lerman, 1985) and is standardized to one.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The other part εij is a stochastic element representing unobservable factors that affect the respondent's decisions in choosing different management scenarios (Rolfe et al, 2004). Therefore, the probability that the individual i chooses alternative j over all other alternatives given in the choice set S can be stated as (Mekonnen et al, 2019; Goibov et al, 2012) Pijgoodbreak=pr0.25em()Uij>Uik0.25emfor0.25emall0.25emnormalJnormalS0.25emnormalJnormalk Substituting the Equation in , we get italicPigoodbreak=Prtrue(V(),XijSigoodbreak+italicεij>Pr()V(),XikSigoodbreak+italicϵikitalicfor0.25emitalicall0.25emJS,Jk The above dissemination of the error term suggests that the probability of any specific alternative j being chosen as the most preferred one is expressed in logistic distribution (McFadden, 1973) expressed in the following equation number (). This specified equation is known as the conditional model expressed as (Hanley et al, 2001) P(),italicUij>italicUikitalicfor0.25emitalicall0.25emjkgoodbreak=exp()μVijexp()μVij where μ is the scale parameter, inversely proportional to the standard deviation of error term V()eijπ26σ2 where σ0.25em is the standard deviation of the error distribution (Ben‐Akiva & Lerman, 1985) and is standardized to one.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once we estimate the parameters in Equation , the valuation of Dal Lake attributes can be obtained through the following equation (Mekonnen et al, 2019): 0.25emitalicWTPgoodbreak=lnmexp()italicVm1italiclnmexp()italicVm0αmonetaryattribute Where WTP is the welfare measure, α represents the income or output from improvement in Lake attributes. This is also denoted through the coefficient of a monetary attribute in the CE.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The existing studies show that farmers' adoption of sustainable practices and new technologies are contingent on a number of factors that are categorized into five broader categories, namely, farm and farmer specific characteristics, social and cultural norms, availability of support and resources, and perceived benefit. (e.g., Barham et al, 2015;Dumbrell et al, 2016;Mekonnen et al, 2020;Pannell et al, 2006;Weber, 2012). Farmers' adoption is also dependent on the types of practices and technologies, but the practice or technology itself has been under-emphasized (Pannell and Zilberman, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%