2014
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2529539
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Valuation of Barrier Options Using Sequential Monte Carlo

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11. It is worth noting that for typical business cases, the number of paths required for acceptable pricing accuracy goes from tens of thousands to millions (depending on the option underlyings) [42,43], so they are well within the range where amplitude estimation becomes more efficient than Monte Carlo, as shown in Fig. 11.…”
Section: Basket Optionsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…11. It is worth noting that for typical business cases, the number of paths required for acceptable pricing accuracy goes from tens of thousands to millions (depending on the option underlyings) [42,43], so they are well within the range where amplitude estimation becomes more efficient than Monte Carlo, as shown in Fig. 11.…”
Section: Basket Optionsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This motivates the development of more advanced stochastic simulation methods which inherit the robustness of MCS, and yet are more efficient in estimating barrier option prices. A range of stochastic simulation techniques for speeding up the convergence have been proposed, such as the MCS approximation correction for constant single barrier options (Beaglehole et al, 1997), the simulation method based on the large deviations theory (Baldi et al, 1999) and the sequential MCS method (Shevchenko and Del Moral, 2017).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…g n (s n−1 , s n ) is probability of no barrier hit within [t n−1 , t n ] conditional on asset taking values s n−1 and s n at t n−1 and t n respectively with s n−1 ∈ (L n , U n ) and s n ∈ (L n , U n ); it is the socalled Brownian bridge correction often used in the literature on pricing barrier options, see e.g. Andersen and Brotherton-Racliffe (1996); Shevchenko (2003); Beaglehole et al (1997); Shevchenko and Del Moral (2014)…”
Section: Barrier Optionmentioning
confidence: 99%