1951
DOI: 10.2307/3310111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Valuation of Closely-Held Stock for Federal Tax Purposes: Approach to an Objective Method

Abstract: The present double-standard approach to the valuation problem discriminates against owners of closely-held stock, that is, corporate shares which have no public market.' The disparity of treatment is traceable to the unfortunate fact that, whereas actual sales or bona fide bid and asked prices govern the valuation for federal tax purposes of listed stocks and of unlisted stocks which "are dealt in through brokers or have a market," 2 the criteria employed in valuing closely-held stock are predominantly subject… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1961
1961
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They asserted that dividend had as much as four times the effect on share price compared to retained earnings. The proposition was corroborated by similar findings (Durand, 1955;Johnson et al, 1951;Fisher, 1961). However, it was Lintner's (1956) pioneering work on dividend payout that put forth the importance of firms' accord to it.…”
Section: Signaling Effectmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…They asserted that dividend had as much as four times the effect on share price compared to retained earnings. The proposition was corroborated by similar findings (Durand, 1955;Johnson et al, 1951;Fisher, 1961). However, it was Lintner's (1956) pioneering work on dividend payout that put forth the importance of firms' accord to it.…”
Section: Signaling Effectmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Empirical studies, based on court case data, have used a variety of variables (see Rice, 1950;Johnson et al, 1951;Grunewald, 1961;Bosland, 1964;Englebrecht, 1976;Jensen, 1978;Lathen, 1982). Most relevant to this study is the work by Englebrecht, who constructed a multiple regression model containing nineteen independent variables which collectively explained 86.5% of the variation in court case valuations.…”
Section: Variable Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%