2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10834-010-9208-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Valuation of Consumers’ Personal Information: A South Korean Example

Abstract: Consumers’ valuation, Contingent valuation method (CVM), Personal information,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, several studies estimated the value of personal information through consumers’ WTA. In those studies, the range of WTA varies from KRW 11,604.7 to KRW 5,889,966.8 (Huang & Lu, 2017; Kim & Yeo, 2010; Kwon et al, 2012; Tanikawa et al, 2019). The difference of estimation WTA stems from the difference of personal information definition and questionnaire scenarios.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, several studies estimated the value of personal information through consumers’ WTA. In those studies, the range of WTA varies from KRW 11,604.7 to KRW 5,889,966.8 (Huang & Lu, 2017; Kim & Yeo, 2010; Kwon et al, 2012; Tanikawa et al, 2019). The difference of estimation WTA stems from the difference of personal information definition and questionnaire scenarios.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Psychological and sociological aspects of retirement decision-making need further investigation. Consumers do not necessarily process information effectively (Kim and Kim 2010). Assumptions may be flawed.…”
Section: Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, several articles studied general populations focusing mainly on urban consumers and families (Kim and Yeo 2010;Liao et al 2010;Wang et al 2019;Ying and Yao 2010). However, we should note that inevitable societal issues may rise along with the economic transformation and development among the Asian countries, such as geographic inequality in economic development and broadened gaps between rich and poor.…”
Section: Stanford Lawmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In turn, WTA was analyzed in the context of data leaks. The respondents were asked to estimate the value of certain information that had been leaked online, according to the study scenario (Kim and Yeo, 2010). On the other hand, Acquisti proposes a study with closed questions, to which the answer is either "yes" or "no", or specifying a certain sum of money.…”
Section: Privacy and Customers -Who Is The Payer?mentioning
confidence: 99%