2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.gecco.2018.e00440
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Valuation of environmental improvements in coastal wetland restoration: A choice experiment approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The restoration of various coastal wetland attributes for the proposed modest, moderate and ambitious improvement scenarios, generated lower-boundary compensating surpluses ranging between 1410 and 2236 INR, which correspond to, respectively, $71 and $112 (international dollars, 2018) using the most recent PPP conversion factors for private consumption from the World Development Indicators (World Bank, 2020). While there are no studies from Kerala with which to compare, the WTP for water quality improvements is in the range of other recent and similar studies (Dias and Belcher, 2015;Tan et al, 2018). Dias and Belcher (2015), for instance, found a value of $91 (international dollars, 2018) as a one-time payment per household for water quality improvement in Canadian prairie wetlands.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The restoration of various coastal wetland attributes for the proposed modest, moderate and ambitious improvement scenarios, generated lower-boundary compensating surpluses ranging between 1410 and 2236 INR, which correspond to, respectively, $71 and $112 (international dollars, 2018) using the most recent PPP conversion factors for private consumption from the World Development Indicators (World Bank, 2020). While there are no studies from Kerala with which to compare, the WTP for water quality improvements is in the range of other recent and similar studies (Dias and Belcher, 2015;Tan et al, 2018). Dias and Belcher (2015), for instance, found a value of $91 (international dollars, 2018) as a one-time payment per household for water quality improvement in Canadian prairie wetlands.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Choice experiments were originally used in communication and transport research [ 20 , 24 , 25 ]. Subsequently, they were adopted in other research areas such as environmental assessment [ 26 , 27 ], market research [ 28 , 29 , 30 ], plant and animal improvement programs [ 31 , 32 , 33 ], environmental and consumer studies [ 34 , 35 ] and, recently, in agricultural value chain research [ 36 , 37 , 38 ]. Choice experiments are based on Lancaster’s consumer behavior theory and McFadden’s random utility theory [ 39 , 40 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third part includes basic information about the individuals, including gender, age, education background, monthly personal income, and preference for ecosystem conservation, among other questions. The connotations of the attributes are explained as follows: The coastal wetland is a highly productive ecosystem [37][38][39]; hence, excessive exploitation of the coastal ecosystems has drawn many scholars' concern over recent years [33,[40][41][42]. Biodiversity reflects the range and diversity of animals and plants in the wetland and is often used as an indicator for assessing coastal ecosystems [33,35,38].…”
Section: □ □ □mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The connotations of the attributes are explained as follows: The coastal wetland is a highly productive ecosystem [37][38][39]; hence, excessive exploitation of the coastal ecosystems has drawn many scholars' concern over recent years [33,[40][41][42]. Biodiversity reflects the range and diversity of animals and plants in the wetland and is often used as an indicator for assessing coastal ecosystems [33,35,38]. Suziana [43] adopted CEM to discuss the conservation of the Malaysian wetland ecosystem, with attributes including environmental conditions, biodiversity, recreational services, flood control, and subsidy changes.…”
Section: □ □ □mentioning
confidence: 99%