2018
DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2019.1557048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Valuation of EQ-5D-5L health states: a comparison of seven Asian populations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
23
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean utility index in our study was higher than that in stroke patients in Korea [7]. The reason may be the different crosswalk value sets used as well as cultural and social distinctions [8,32].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The mean utility index in our study was higher than that in stroke patients in Korea [7]. The reason may be the different crosswalk value sets used as well as cultural and social distinctions [8,32].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…Our ndings showed that PD was the most frequently reported issue. Pain after stroke is a common clinical problem that not only increases depression and cognitive issues but also impairs quality of life [8,32]. Moreover, pain after stroke is usually underdiagnosed and undertreated [33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the EQ-5D index and EQ-VAS scores were higher than those CHD patients from Slovenia (0.60 and 58.6, respectively). The reason may be the different cross-walk value sets used 32 . www.nature.com/scientificreports/ Our findings showed that 55.6% of CHD patients reported being in full health, which was higher than of the proportion of Australian adults reporting the same (42.8%) 33 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EQ-5D-5L questionnaire has been frequently used to assess the HRQoL of various populations, ranging from general population to patients with mental disorders, cancers, etc. [7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%