2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2012.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Valuation of housing and neighbourhood attributes for city centre location: A case study in Santiago

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the West, it is found that people have a higher willingness to pay for accessibility to jobs, cleanliness and security of the neighbourhood, for avoiding to live near landfills, and for higher air quality, than for gyms and cultural services (Hite, 2009;Torres et al, 2013). It indicates that consumers also consider the living environment when they purchase a house, probably for the health related reasons.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the West, it is found that people have a higher willingness to pay for accessibility to jobs, cleanliness and security of the neighbourhood, for avoiding to live near landfills, and for higher air quality, than for gyms and cultural services (Hite, 2009;Torres et al, 2013). It indicates that consumers also consider the living environment when they purchase a house, probably for the health related reasons.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have identified that the contingent valuation survey method (Altaf, 1994;Kang, Haab, & Interis, 2013;Torres, Green, & Ortúzar, 2013), travel costs method (Chae, Wattage, & Pascoe, 2012;Gürlük & Rehber, 2008) and hedonic price method (Chan, So, Tang, & Wong, 2012;Cotteleer & Kooten, 2012) are the most used for determining the implicit price of an attribute for substitution with a less desired option.…”
Section: The Hedonic Price Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attributes o f the living environment for which people are willing to pay extra are accessibility to jobs, cleanliness and security, distance from landfills, and higher air quality. These attributes are valued more than sports facilities and cultural services (Hite, 2009;Torres et al, 2013). In mainland China it has been found that people are willing to pay more for neighbourhood safety and improved accessibility (Wang and Li, 2004;2006).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%