2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.04.1283
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Valuation of Informal Care Provided to People Living With Dementia: A Systematic Literature Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As in any other study, but especially in cost studies, we must consider the external validity of our results. In this respect, differences between countries, with different organizational and funding models, as well as in the perspective chosen for the analysis may be important, as has been pointed out in the literature referring to this disease [13,61,62,[64][65][66]; especially when some studies have already shown differences between cohorts of dementia patients in different countries in relation to socio-demographic and clinical factors [67,68]. Moreover, we must consider recent studies that indicate a probable relative decrease in the population impact of dementia.…”
Section: External Validity and Extrapolation Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As in any other study, but especially in cost studies, we must consider the external validity of our results. In this respect, differences between countries, with different organizational and funding models, as well as in the perspective chosen for the analysis may be important, as has been pointed out in the literature referring to this disease [13,61,62,[64][65][66]; especially when some studies have already shown differences between cohorts of dementia patients in different countries in relation to socio-demographic and clinical factors [67,68]. Moreover, we must consider recent studies that indicate a probable relative decrease in the population impact of dementia.…”
Section: External Validity and Extrapolation Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The societal costs associated with nonprofessional care are high and depend on the methodology used to calculate them [60][61][62]. Regardless of these considerations, these studies, at least to our knowledge, do not usually perform matching processes such as the one we performed, especially regarding the burden of disease.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While our research spotlights First Nations caregivers’ and providers’ situation, in particular caregivers’ invisibility, Canadian caregivers are also the invisible workforce. There is a general reluctance to account for the contributions of the family care sector [ 58 , 59 ]. As Economist Janet Fast points out, the inequities are also invisible [ 2 , 3 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In valuing informal care, a systematic literature review identified the replacement cost method and the opportunity cost approach as the two most common approaches. 24 The replacement cost approach assigns values for informal care hours based on the market wage paid to formal caregivers with the rationale that if the informal caregiver were unavailable, the respondent could hire a formal caregiver as a “replacement.” In this study, we have taken a “replacement” approach, valuing informal care time based on the wages of social service workers providing non-residential care, obtained from Eurofound]. 25 The wages of social services workers ranged from 63% to 93% of mean earnings in each country.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%